digitalmars.D.learn - Re: Fuzzy string matching?
- dsmith <ds nomail.com> Jul 15 2011
- Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> Jul 15 2011
- Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> Jul 16 2011
Could you demonstrate how to use std.regex for pattern matching, preferably
with a bool method?
My usage of std.regex.match yields this error:
core.exception.AssertError /usr/include/d/dmd/phobos/std/regex.d(1796):
4294967295 .. 4294967295 vs. 5
My usage is: auto m = match(long_string, regex(str));
writeln(m.hit);
== Repost the article of Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg gmx.com)
== Posted at 2011/07/16 01:08 to digitalmars.D.learn
On Saturday 16 July 2011 05:07:38 dsmith wrote:
Until recently, you could easily use std.regexp.search(target_string,
find_string), but regexp is apparently no longer in phobos. I seek a
simple substitute. std.algorithm.canFind might work, as it is bool.
Maybe try something like:
foreach(str; strings)
foreach(fls; system_files)
if(std.algorithm.canFind(fls, str)) // usage needs verification
str ~= ".ext";
std.regex is std.regexp's replacement.
- Jonathan M davis
Jul 15 2011
On Saturday 16 July 2011 06:17:56 dsmith wrote:Could you demonstrate how to use std.regex for pattern matching, preferably with a bool method? My usage of std.regex.match yields this error: core.exception.AssertError /usr/include/d/dmd/phobos/std/regex.d(1796): 4294967295 .. 4294967295 vs. 5 My usage is: auto m = match(long_string, regex(str)); writeln(m.hit);
I'm afraid that I've never used either std.regexp or std.regex, so I'm not familiar with the usage of either one. There's every chance that this is a bug rather than misuse on your part. I'd advise posting a question about it separately (so that people are more likely to see it) with an appropriate subject, and there's a decent chance that someone who's actually familiar with std.regex will answer your question. - Jonathan M Davis
Jul 15 2011
On 16.07.2011 10:17, dsmith wrote:Could you demonstrate how to use std.regex for pattern matching, preferably with a bool method? My usage of std.regex.match yields this error: core.exception.AssertError /usr/include/d/dmd/phobos/std/regex.d(1796): 4294967295 .. 4294967295 vs. 5 My usage is: auto m = match(long_string, regex(str)); writeln(m.hit);
Your and apparently an awful lot of people hit this, the thing is that .hit method is returning _matched slice_ of string if there is a match and asserts otherwise. (there is also issue of this assert having message is of a _very_ poor quality) As it stands now regex works like ranges: you need to check if it was empty then use it, so if all you want to do is a test: auto m = match(long_string, regex(str)); writeln(!m.empty); // substitute for "there was match" Thinking more about this, it should be in synopsis part of std.regex in docs on d-p-l.org. Along with something like: foreach(m; match("abc", regex("\w", "g")) //uses range syntax to iterate over all matches (so empty is checked) writeln(m.hit); // here m.hit is guaranteed to hold something (and not asserting)== Repost the article of Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg gmx.com) == Posted at 2011/07/16 01:08 to digitalmars.D.learn On�Saturday�16�July�2011�05:07:38�dsmith�wrote:�Until�recently,�you�could�easily�use�std.regexp.search(target_string, �find_string),�but�regexp�is�apparently�no�longer�in�phobos.��I�seek�a �simple�substitute.��std.algorithm.canFind�might�work,�as�it�is�bool. �Maybe�try�something�like: �foreach(str;�strings) �����foreach(fls;�system_files) ���������if(std.algorithm.canFind(fls,�str))���//�usage�needs�verification str�~=�".ext";
-�Jonathan�M�davis
-- Dmitry Olshansky
Jul 16 2011









Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> 