digitalmars.D - Re: in vs. const
- Kagamin <spam here.lot> Mar 09 2009
- "Denis Koroskin" <2korden gmail.com> Mar 09 2009
- Kagamin <spam here.lot> Mar 09 2009
Sergey Gromov Wrote:In D2, 'in' means 'const scope'. I've seen that in writing but can't remember where.
How can it be scope? If you have scope object, it gets *destructed* when leaving scope: when function exits. Ouch.
Mar 09 2009
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:07:05 +0300, Kagamin <spam here.lot> wrote:Sergey Gromov Wrote:In D2, 'in' means 'const scope'. I've seen that in writing but can't remember where.
How can it be scope? If you have scope object, it gets *destructed* when leaving scope: when function exits. Ouch.
No. Scope has different meaning here. For example, delegates don't cause heap allocation when passed as scope parameters in D2.
Mar 09 2009
Denis Koroskin Wrote:No. Scope has different meaning here.
O RLY? That's good news.
Mar 09 2009