digitalmars.D - Re: compile-time regex redux
- renoX <renosky free.fr> Feb 12 2007
Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website For Email) Wrote: []Au contraire, I think it's a definite step in the right direction. Writing programs that write programs is a great way of doing more with less effort.
As long as it works yes, but if you need to debug the result, you're most likely going to suffer a lot.. Also this can leads to huge compile time due to code expansion (been there with generated C++ code: 6h compilation time(!) and full compilation needed each time due to the difficulty to track dependencies). So it is a bit like TNT: a useful tool sure, but a dangerous one too. renoX
Feb 12 2007
renoX wrote:Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website For Email) Wrote: []Au contraire, I think it's a definite step in the right direction. Writing programs that write programs is a great way of doing more with less effort.
As long as it works yes, but if you need to debug the result, you're most likely going to suffer a lot.. Also this can leads to huge compile time due to code expansion (been there with generated C++ code: 6h compilation time(!) and full compilation needed each time due to the difficulty to track dependencies). So it is a bit like TNT: a useful tool sure, but a dangerous one too. renoX
Compile times for metacode will reduce dramatically (to become a practical non-issue in most cases) through the technology that Walter is working on right now. Let's not forget that TNT moderated by carbon gave us dynamite :o). Andrei
Feb 12 2007