• Dan <murpsoft hotmail.com> Jun 04 2007
• Jason House <jason.james.house gmail.com> Jun 04 2007

Dan <murpsoft hotmail.com> writes:

Robert Fraser Wrote:

 DSSS seems like a great tool, but only a very small subset of available D
libraries are installable via it. I can see it turning into something like
CPAN, where you can easily get a module and its required dependencies, without
really having to worry about version compatibility, etc, etc. ANy ideas on why
it's not more widely used?


I too am interested in DSSS.  I'm a bit of a perfectionist... I've spent closer
to 80 hours just tinkering with the architecture of Walnut 2.x; my issue would
be with version control as well.  I would need it to allow me to produce
several executables from the same source - a batch interpreter, an interactive
interpreter, a dll com server jscript replacement, and a dll/lib spidermonkey
replacement.  All of those ought to use the same sources.

Is that possible?

Jason House <jason.james.house gmail.com> writes:

Dan wrote:
 I too am interested in DSSS.  I'm a bit of a perfectionist... I've spent
closer to 80 hours just tinkering with the architecture of Walnut 2.x; my issue
would be with version control as well.  I would need it to allow me to produce
several executables from the same source - a batch interpreter, an interactive
interpreter, a dll com server jscript replacement, and a dll/lib spidermonkey
replacement.  All of those ought to use the same sources.


I'd like that feature too.  In addition, I have scripts that generate d 
files.  Before I can get rid of my trusty makefiles, I need something to 
allow me to do that easily.

 
 Is that possible?