• MikeyMoose <mikey mikeymoose.com> Dec 15 2009
• Robert Clipsham <robert octarineparrot.com> Dec 15 2009
• retard <re tard.com.invalid> Dec 15 2009
• Alix Pexton <alix.DOT.pexton gmail.DOT.com> Dec 16 2009
• Alix Pexton <alix.DOT.pexton gmail.DOT.com> Dec 16 2009
• jpf <spam example.com> Dec 16 2009

MikeyMoose <mikey mikeymoose.com> writes:

Lionello Lunesu Wrote:

 Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my
 laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear
 as new top-level posts.
 


I'm getting that as well.  Started when I upgraded to 3.0.

m

Robert Clipsham <robert octarineparrot.com> writes:

On 15/12/09 22:25, MikeyMoose wrote:
 Lionello Lunesu Wrote:

 Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On my
 laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread appear
 as new top-level posts.


 I'm getting that as well.  Started when I upgraded to 3.0.

 m


Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using 
Thunderbird 3 or because it's not laying out threads properly, or even 
if the server's at fault and Thunderbird 2 relied on buggy behaviour... 
I guess we'll see if this post becomes top level (Posted using TB3).

retard <re tard.com.invalid> writes:

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:16:05 +0000, Robert Clipsham wrote:

 On 15/12/09 22:25, MikeyMoose wrote:
 Lionello Lunesu Wrote:

 Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On
 my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread
 appear as new top-level posts.



 m


 Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using
 Thunderbird 3 or because it's not laying out threads properly, or even
 if the server's at fault and Thunderbird 2 relied on buggy behaviour...
 I guess we'll see if this post becomes top level (Posted using TB3).


Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the 
correct thread even when the post was sent with a broken client. Some 
posts seem to erroneously become top level no matter what client I use. 
This whole mess started when the web interface was introduced.

Alix Pexton <alix.DOT.pexton gmail.DOT.com> writes:

On 15/12/2009 23:30, retard wrote:
 Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:16:05 +0000, Robert Clipsham wrote:

 On 15/12/09 22:25, MikeyMoose wrote:
 Lionello Lunesu Wrote:

 Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On
 my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread
 appear as new top-level posts.



 m


 Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using
 Thunderbird 3 or because it's not laying out threads properly, or even
 if the server's at fault and Thunderbird 2 relied on buggy behaviour...
 I guess we'll see if this post becomes top level (Posted using TB3).


 Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the
 correct thread even when the post was sent with a broken client. Some
 posts seem to erroneously become top level no matter what client I use.
 This whole mess started when the web interface was introduced.


I did a bit of googling and found this page,

http://www.pythian.com/news/4205/testing-thunderbird-3-what-to-do-if-it-shreds-your-threads/

I'm about to try it, fingers crossed ^^

A...

Alix Pexton <alix.DOT.pexton gmail.DOT.com> writes:

On 16/12/2009 11:05, Alix Pexton wrote:
 On 15/12/2009 23:30, retard wrote:
 Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:16:05 +0000, Robert Clipsham wrote:

 On 15/12/09 22:25, MikeyMoose wrote:
 Lionello Lunesu Wrote:

 Is anybody else here experiencing problems with Thunderbird 3 RC? On
 my laptop many post that are clearly replies to an existing thread
 appear as new top-level posts.



 m


 Same issue here, I don't know if it's because the posters are using
 Thunderbird 3 or because it's not laying out threads properly, or even
 if the server's at fault and Thunderbird 2 relied on buggy behaviour...
 I guess we'll see if this post becomes top level (Posted using TB3).


 Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the
 correct thread even when the post was sent with a broken client. Some
 posts seem to erroneously become top level no matter what client I use.
 This whole mess started when the web interface was introduced.


 I did a bit of googling and found this page,

 http://www.pythian.com/news/4205/testing-thunderbird-3-what-to-do-if-it-shreds-your-threads/


 I'm about to try it, fingers crossed ^^

 A...


Hmn, doesn't seem to have worked, damn ><

A...

jpf <spam example.com> writes:

On 16.12.2009 00:30, retard wrote:
 
 Probably the previous versions of Thunderbird somehow inferred the 
 correct thread even when the post was sent with a broken client. Some 
 posts seem to erroneously become top level no matter what client I use. 
 This whole mess started when the web interface was introduced.


I just had a quick look at the headers of the broken messages and they
were indeed all send with the webnews client. It seems like the webnews
client doesn't set the 'References' header for those messages. Strangely
most messages posted with webnews have the references header set though,
I don't know why it sometimes doesn't work.

Header examples:
Webnews, bad threading

Path: digitalmars.com!not-for-mail
From: /removed/
Newsgroups: digitalmars.D
Subject: Re: transporting qualifier from parameter to the return value
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:48:54 -0500
Organization: Digital Mars
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <hgaog6$89p$1 digitalmars.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: digitalmars.com 1260971334 8505 65.204.18.200 (16 Dec 2009
13:48:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet digitalmars.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:48:54 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Web-News v.1.6.3 (by Terence Yim)
Xref: digitalmars.com digitalmars.D:103651

Opera, working threading

Path: digitalmars.com!not-for-mail
From: /removed/
Newsgroups: digitalmars.D
Subject: Re: transporting qualifier from parameter to the return value
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:41:19 -0500
Organization: Digital Mars
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <op.u40hu5yeeav7ka localhost.localdomain>
*References: <hg9il4$ada$1 digitalmars.com>*
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: digitalmars.com 1260934881 15220 76.119.224.220 (16 Dec 2009
03:41:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet digitalmars.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux)
Xref: digitalmars.com digitalmars.D:103611