digitalmars.D - Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupid PITA
- bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> Mar 26 2010
Andrei Alexandrescu:Could you please paste C# code doing that here? Then we have a good baseline to compare the D implementation with.
It's hard to write such things, you have to be an expert C# programmer (you have to write C# code that operates on the AST or the language of the virtual machine). I have asked but I am not good enough to do that, sorry. Metaprogramming is not easy in most languages that allow some of it :-)Why and how do you believe that whatever mechanism we come up with (possibly following a proposal authored by you) will be a net improvement over mixins?
You are right, I can't know. Note: user-defined attributes and mixins have different purposes. User-defined attributes are much fitter than mixins if you want to add something simple to the type system. I have found an introduction on C# attributes, but it doesn't show actions on the AST/IL: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/attributes.aspx?display=PrintAre you sure you are saying what you mean to say?
Here D template syntax is better, you are right. Bye, bearophile
Mar 26 2010