digitalmars.D - Re: Core vs Library
- Don <nospam nospam.com> Apr 15 2008
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:"Walter Bright" <newshound1 digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:ftv48m$21m5$1 digitalmars.com...
1: Yes, in .Net languages the core types are aliases to structs in System, not the other way around. 2: The article seems self-contradictory. First you say that an int as a struct is slow, possibly ugly, can't be optimized, etc. etc. But then you turn around and say that modern compilers can make a user-defined complex type efficient. Which is it? It doesn't feel like the article comes to any kind of conclusion. Is it that fundamental types like int and float should be builtin, while anything higher-level including complex can be done satisfactorily as a library?
I got the message that there's a 'sweet spot' in how much the language does vs how much the library does. With advances in compiler technology, the sweet spot is gradually moving towards library implementation, but it's unlikely that it will *ever* move to 100% library, and it's certainly not there now. Currently the sweet spot is roughly at complex numbers. -don.
Apr 15 2008