digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 6924] New: An alias this problem to implement a Typedef
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (39/39) Nov 09 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6924
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (18/18) Nov 12 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6924
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6924 Summary: An alias this problem to implement a Typedef Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2011-11-09 20:03:18 PST --- I find typedef useful still. While trying to create something like a typedef using a struct with "alias this", I have found this problem: struct Typedef(T) { T data; alias data this; } alias int[] TA1; typedef int[] TA2; alias Typedef!(int[]) TA3; immutable TA1 a1; immutable TA2 a2; TA3 a3a; immutable TA3 a3b; static this() { a1 = [1, 2, 3]; // OK a2 = [1, 2, 3]; // OK a3a = [1, 2, 3]; // OK a3b = [1, 2, 3]; // line 16, error } void main() {} DMD 2.057beta gives: test.d(16): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression ([1,2,3]) of type int[] to immutable(Typedef!(int[])) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 09 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6924 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> 2011-11-12 06:56:29 PST --- I think this is a same issue with bug 6174. The assignment expression a3b = [1, 2, 3]; is translated to a3b.data = [1, 2, 3]; , and current dmd does not allow indirect initialization of members with assignment. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6174 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 12 2011