www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 6923] New: Not restrictive initialization semantics


           Summary: Not restrictive initialization semantics
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: x86
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs eml.cc

--- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2011-11-09 19:56:08 PST ---
This is not exactly a bug report, it's just an example of code that shows a
possible design/implementation problem.

Code by Timon Gehr:

A comment:

 I think the current initialization semantics are not restrictive enough.
------------------------- immutable(int)* p; void foo() { // checks if values pointed to by p are really immutable static int[immutable(int)*] mem; if (p !in mem) mem[p] = *p; else assert(mem[p] == *p); // fail. } struct Foo { immutable int x; this(int y) { p = &x; foo(); x = 1; foo(); } } void main() { Foo(2); } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 09 2011