www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 5533] New: DMD segv: -gc, associative arrays, const pointers to self

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5533

           Summary: DMD segv: -gc, associative arrays, const pointers to
                    self
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: x86
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: regression
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: webmaster villagersonline.com


--- Comment #0 from Russ Lewis <webmaster villagersonline.com> 2011-02-06
12:50:03 PST ---
Regression from 2.050 to 2.051 (Linux).

When compiling with -gc -c, the testcase below will cause 2.051 to segv.
File compiles OK on 2.050.
File also compiles just fine (even on 2.051) if -gc is omitted.
DMD produces expected link errors if you compile with only -gc argument.

The key issues appear to be:
  - The foreach loop inside the function.
  - The parent pointer in Foo must be *BOTH* const and a pointer to its own
    type.  If you make it non-const, or a pointer to something else, it works.

TESTCASE:

void DMD_BUG_WORKAROUND()  // issue 3770
{
  /* if you don't have a dummy function like this in the module where a type
   * was declared, then dmd won't give it to you when you use it in an
   * associative array elsewhere, and you'll get link errors.
   */
  Foo    tmp;
  string dummy;

  foreach(name; tmp.table.keys)
    dummy ~= name;
}

struct Foo
{
  const(Foo)       *parent;
  FooElem*[string]  table;
};

struct FooElem
{
};

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 06 2011
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5533


yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yebblies gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> 2011-07-04 02:35:02 EST ---
This works for me on win32 with dmd head (2.054).
Can anybody reproduce this on linux with the current dmd?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 03 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5533



--- Comment #2 from Russ Lewis <webmaster villagersonline.com> 2011-07-25
21:45:17 PDT ---
I tested this on 2.054 (Linux: Fedora 14 x86 32-bit), and the problem still
exists.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 25 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5533



--- Comment #3 from Russ Lewis <webmaster villagersonline.com> 2011-08-26
13:50:27 PDT ---
I built dmd and ran it under gdb, and it appears that the problem is infinite
recursion in the function dwarf_typidx(TYPE*).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 26 2011
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5533


klickverbot <code klickverbot.at> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |code klickverbot.at
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


--- Comment #4 from klickverbot <code klickverbot.at> 2011-12-19 10:08:15 PST
---
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 7127 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 19 2011