digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 5532] New: Overloading an operator breaks when using typeof(this)
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (27/27) Feb 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Feb 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/16) Feb 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Feb 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Feb 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532 Summary: Overloading an operator breaks when using typeof(this) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: akb825 gmail.com --- Comment #0 from akb825 gmail.com 2011-02-06 10:58:08 PST --- If you overload an operator and use tyepof(this) as the type of the parameter, the compiler will throw an error about incompatible types. See the attached d source file for an example. This can be worked around by using the struct/class name instead of typeof(this) for the parameter. If you're defining the operator in a template mixin (the case where I originally noticed the bug), you will need to pass the type as a template argument. I am using gdc 2.051 compiled against gcc version 4.5.2 on an x64 Linux system running Debian Squeeze. I initially posted this on gdc's bug tracker (https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/150/overloading-an-operator-breaks-when-using#comment-362929) but they said it's likely a problem with the frontend. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532 --- Comment #1 from akb825 gmail.com 2011-02-06 11:02:12 PST --- Created an attachment (id=900) Test source file that displays the errant behavior. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532 bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bearophile_hugs eml.cc --- Comment #2 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2011-02-06 11:34:51 PST --- Reduced test case: struct Foo { void opBinary(string op)(typeof(this) other) {} } void main() { Foo() + Foo(); } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2011-02-06 11:57:04 PST --- It seems a dupe of my bug 4413 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5532 bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2011-02-06 11:58:11 PST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4413 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 06 2011