digitalmars.D.learn - Buliding DSFML2? (64-bit Linux)
- Sean Eskapp <eatingstaples gmail.com> Mar 18 2011
- Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> Mar 18 2011
- Sean Eskapp <eatingstaples gmail.com> Mar 18 2011
- Sean Eskapp <eatingstaples gmail.com> Mar 18 2011
- Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> Mar 18 2011
I've been trying for weeks to build the D bindings of SFML2, but with little success. The main issue is that I get a myriad of linker errors (documented at http://www.sfml-dev.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=28345#28345), but I can't figure out what linking options would solve them. Can anybody shed some light on this?
Mar 18 2011
On Friday, March 18, 2011 17:56:44 Sean Eskapp wrote:I've been trying for weeks to build the D bindings of SFML2, but with little success. The main issue is that I get a myriad of linker errors (documented at http://www.sfml-dev.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=28345#28345), but I can't figure out what linking options would solve them. Can anybody shed some light on this?
Just glancing at it, it looks like you might be missing pthreads, though that would be pretty weird. You don't normally need to specify -lpthread. But those symbols sure look like they're likely pthread-related. - Jonathan M Davis
Mar 18 2011
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg gmx.com)'s articleOn Friday, March 18, 2011 17:56:44 Sean Eskapp wrote:I've been trying for weeks to build the D bindings of SFML2, but
little success. The main issue is that I get a myriad of linker
(documented at http://www.sfml-dev.org/forum/viewtopic.php?
but I can't figure out what linking options would solve them. Can anybody shed some light on this?
would be pretty weird. You don't normally need to specify -
symbols sure look like they're likely pthread-related. - Jonathan M Davis
I've tried -lpthread and -lm, and neither seemed to help. Is it possible there are platform issues, since D (to my knowledge) is 32- bit, and I'm 64-bit?
Mar 18 2011
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg gmx.com)'s articleOn Friday, March 18, 2011 18:58:49 Sean Eskapp wrote:== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg gmx.com)'s articleOn Friday, March 18, 2011 17:56:44 Sean Eskapp wrote:I've been trying for weeks to build the D bindings of SFML2,
withlittle success. The main issue is that I get a myriad of
errors(documented at http://www.sfml-dev.org/forum/viewtopic.php?
p=28345#28345),but I can't figure out what linking options would solve
Can anybody shed some light on this?
Just glancing at it, it looks like you might be missing
though thatwould be pretty weird. You don't normally need to specify -
lpthread. But thosesymbols sure look like they're likely pthread-related. - Jonathan M Davis
I've tried -lpthread and -lm, and neither seemed to help. Is it possible there are platform issues, since D (to my knowledge) is
bit, and I'm 64-bit?
Linux, but if you don't pass it -m64 (or if you explicitly pass it
will compile in 32-bit. And if it's compiling in 32-bit, then you
bit versions of whatever libraries that you're using. pthread is
So, if you don't have a 32-bit version of pthread installed, then
explain it. - Jonathan M Davis
Perfect, thanks!
Mar 18 2011
On Friday, March 18, 2011 18:58:49 Sean Eskapp wrote:== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg gmx.com)'s articleOn Friday, March 18, 2011 17:56:44 Sean Eskapp wrote:I've been trying for weeks to build the D bindings of SFML2, but
withlittle success. The main issue is that I get a myriad of linker
errors(documented at http://www.sfml-dev.org/forum/viewtopic.php?
p=28345#28345),but I can't figure out what linking options would solve them. Can anybody shed some light on this?
Just glancing at it, it looks like you might be missing pthreads,
though thatwould be pretty weird. You don't normally need to specify -
lpthread. But thosesymbols sure look like they're likely pthread-related. - Jonathan M Davis
I've tried -lpthread and -lm, and neither seemed to help. Is it possible there are platform issues, since D (to my knowledge) is 32- bit, and I'm 64-bit?
Well, as of dmd 2.052, if you pass -m64 to dmd, it'll compile in 64-bit on Linux, but if you don't pass it -m64 (or if you explicitly pass it -m32), it will compile in 32-bit. And if it's compiling in 32-bit, then you need the 32- bit versions of whatever libraries that you're using. pthread is one of them. So, if you don't have a 32-bit version of pthread installed, then that would explain it. - Jonathan M Davis
Mar 18 2011









Sean Eskapp <eatingstaples gmail.com> 