www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.announce - Dmitry Olshansky Passes GSoC Final Evaluation

reply Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:
Hi everybody,


I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation. 
Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos. 
This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself, 
but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going 
with the integration.


Thanks,

Andrei
Aug 24 2012
next sibling parent "Simen Kjaeraas" <simen.kjaras gmail.com> writes:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:50:37 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu  
<SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> wrote:

 Hi everybody,


 I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.  
 Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.  
 This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,  
 but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

 Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going  
 with the integration.

Congratulations! -- Simen
Aug 24 2012
prev sibling parent reply Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:
On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Hi everybody,


 I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
 Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
 This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
 but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

Thanks for your faith in me :o)
 Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
 with the integration.

It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well stall the process: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348 And this one makes all isXXX impure atm: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446 -- Olshansky Dmitry
Aug 24 2012
next sibling parent reply Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:
On 8/24/12 2:44 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Hi everybody,


 I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
 Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
 This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
 but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

Thanks for your faith in me :o)
 Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
 with the integration.

It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well stall the process: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348 And this one makes all isXXX impure atm: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446

I elevated all these bugs to blocker status. BTW I wonder which is higher - P1 or P5? Andrei
Aug 24 2012
parent =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= <alex lycus.org> writes:
On 24-08-2012 20:49, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 On 8/24/12 2:44 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Hi everybody,


 I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
 Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
 This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
 but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

Thanks for your faith in me :o)
 Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
 with the integration.

It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well stall the process: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348 And this one makes all isXXX impure atm: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446

I elevated all these bugs to blocker status. BTW I wonder which is higher - P1 or P5? Andrei

They mean priority, so P1 would be highest. -- Alex Rønne Petersen alex lycus.org http://lycus.org
Aug 24 2012
prev sibling parent "Kagamin" <spam here.lot> writes:
docs: 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/page.cgi?id=fields.html#importance
Aug 25 2012