c++.idde - Windows XP
- "Jon Allen" <jallen minotstateu.edu> Mar 28 2003
- "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> Mar 28 2003
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Mar 29 2003
- "Jon Allen" <jallen minotstateu.edu> Mar 31 2003
- "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> Mar 31 2003
Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP? I recently switched from Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly. It seems like the trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc). I've tried all the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no theming) and it doesn't seem to help. It's really annoying that my p133 runs this thing faster than my athlon 1700.
Mar 28 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> No problems on Intel 2GHz XP "Jon Allen" <jallen minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b62nr9$1io6$1 digitaldaemon.com...Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP? I recently switched from Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly. It seems like
trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc). I've tried
the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no theming)
it doesn't seem to help. It's really annoying that my p133 runs this
faster than my athlon 1700.
Mar 28 2003
"Jon Allen" <jallen minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b62nr9$1io6$1 digitaldaemon.com...Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP? I recently switched from Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly. It seems like
trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc). I've tried
the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no theming)
it doesn't seem to help. It's really annoying that my p133 runs this
faster than my athlon 1700.
slashdot is running a story about Windows XP SP1 running apps 10 times slower. Perhaps that's related? http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/28/2220247.shtml?tid=201
Mar 29 2003
nope, don't have sp1, a friend told me it made his system flaky so i didn't bother :-) "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:b64mk1$1hs$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Jon Allen" <jallen minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b62nr9$1io6$1 digitaldaemon.com...Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP? I recently switched
Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly. It seems like
trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc). I've tried
the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no theming)
it doesn't seem to help. It's really annoying that my p133 runs this
faster than my athlon 1700.
slashdot is running a story about Windows XP SP1 running apps 10 times slower. Perhaps that's related? http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/28/2220247.shtml?tid=201
Mar 31 2003
Much less flaky, IME "Jon Allen" <jallen minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b6a9dp$10vb$1 digitaldaemon.com...nope, don't have sp1, a friend told me it made his system flaky so i
bother :-) "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:b64mk1$1hs$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Jon Allen" <jallen minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b62nr9$1io6$1 digitaldaemon.com...Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP? I recently switched
Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly. It seems
thetrouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc). I've
allthe little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no
andit doesn't seem to help. It's really annoying that my p133 runs this
faster than my athlon 1700.
slashdot is running a story about Windows XP SP1 running apps 10 times slower. Perhaps that's related? http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/28/2220247.shtml?tid=201
Mar 31 2003