• "Nicolas Repiquet" <deadcow-remove-this free.fr> Sep 22 2003
• "DrakeX" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Sep 22 2003
• "Nicolas Repiquet" <deadcow-remove-this free.fr> Sep 23 2003
• "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Sep 28 2003

"Nicolas Repiquet" <deadcow-remove-this free.fr> writes:

Hi folks,

Im trying to understand why this works :

char[] foo;
foo ~= "fo";
foo ~= 'o';

and why this dont :

char[] foo;
foo = foo ~ "fo";
foo = foo ~ 'o'; // <- error here

They are supposed to do the same thing aren't they ?


-- Nicolas Repiquet

"DrakeX" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

does putting double quotes around the o help?  like

char[] foo;
foo = foo ~ "fo";
foo = foo ~ "o";

"Nicolas Repiquet" <deadcow-remove-this free.fr> writes:

"DrakeX" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message news:
bko2ar$gsv$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 does putting double quotes around the o help?  like

 char[] foo;
 foo = foo ~ "fo";
 foo = foo ~ "o";


Yes it works, but my message was not an "how to do it" message, I just wanna
point out a strange behaviour. Thank you for your help anyway.

-- Nicolas Repiquet

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Nicolas Repiquet" <deadcow-remove-this free.fr> wrote in message
news:bkmgar$dnt$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Hi folks,

 Im trying to understand why this works :

 char[] foo;
 foo ~= "fo";
 foo ~= 'o';

 and why this dont :

 char[] foo;
 foo = foo ~ "fo";
 foo = foo ~ 'o'; // <- error here

 They are supposed to do the same thing aren't they ?


It's supposed to do the same thing, it's a bug that it doesn't. -Walter