digitalmars.D - the naked keyword is an attribute - but it looks like an function
- dennis luehring (29/29) Feb 21 2011 naked INSIDE of the context which is adress with the attribute - looks
- Denis Koroskin (5/34) Feb 21 2011 Yes, naked applied to the whole function body, and I proposed to make it...
naked INSIDE of the context which is adress with the attribute - looks very strange to me, because it changes the pro- AND epilog of an function/codeblock real blabla(real x) { asm{ naked; mov EAX,[RSP]; naked; add EAX,0x3fff; naked; } } wouldn't it be better to have something like naked asm{ ... } or real blabla(real x) naked { naked asm{ } } or like delphi does real blabla( x: real ) assembler { mov EAX,[RSP]; add EAX,0x3fff; }
Feb 21 2011
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:45:21 +0300, dennis luehring <dl.soluz gmx.net> wrote:naked INSIDE of the context which is adress with the attribute - looks very strange to me, because it changes the pro- AND epilog of an function/codeblock real blabla(real x) { asm{ naked; mov EAX,[RSP]; naked; add EAX,0x3fff; naked; } } wouldn't it be better to have something like naked asm{ ... } or real blabla(real x) naked { naked asm{ } } or like delphi does real blabla( x: real ) assembler { mov EAX,[RSP]; add EAX,0x3fff; }Yes, naked applied to the whole function body, and I proposed to make it an external attribute because of that: http://www.mail-archive.com/digitalmars-d puremagic.com/msg22593.html
Feb 21 2011