• Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (5/5) Nov 15 2020 I wan't aware that `opPostMove` has been implemented as a
• Paul Backus (6/11) Nov 15 2020 I believe that opPostMove was abandoned in favor of move
• Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (2/6) Nov 15 2020 Ahh. I kind of knew that. Thanks.

Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

I wan't aware that `opPostMove` has been implemented as a 
callback to `move` inside the druntime!

https://dlang.org/library/std/traits/has_elaborate_move.html

Why hasn't support for dmd been added already?
Lack of time?

Paul Backus <snarwin gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 15 November 2020 at 13:43:19 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
 I wan't aware that `opPostMove` has been implemented as a 
 callback to `move` inside the druntime!

 https://dlang.org/library/std/traits/has_elaborate_move.html

 Why hasn't support for dmd been added already?
 Lack of time?

I believe that opPostMove was abandoned in favor of move 
constructors for more or less the same reason that postblits were 
abandoned in favor of copy constructors (that is, problems with 
const/immutable).

I'm not sure what the current status of move constructors is.

Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 15 November 2020 at 13:49:59 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
 I believe that opPostMove was abandoned in favor of move 
 constructors for more or less the same reason that postblits 
 were abandoned in favor of copy constructors (that is, problems 
 with const/immutable).

Ahh. I kind of knew that. Thanks.