• Big Bill (2/2) Nov 05 2008 i just wonder here,
• Bill Baxter (9/11) Nov 05 2008 No it does not, and this is how you can implement a "reserve_capacity"
• Jarrett Billingsley (7/9) Nov 05 2008 free(x) doesn't clear the contents of x. In fact it's completely
• Bill Baxter (7/17) Nov 05 2008 And if you want to let the GC handle it, then

Big Bill <bigdorkyb tengu.com> writes:

i just wonder here,

free(x); will free contents of x, but will x.length=0 free memory too?

"Bill Baxter" <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Big Bill <bigdorkyb tengu.com> wrote:
 i just wonder here,

 free(x); will free contents of x, but will x.length=0 free memory too?

No it does not, and this is how you can implement a "reserve_capacity"
kind of function for D arrays.

void reserve_capacity(T)(ref T[] a, size_t N) {
    size_t orig_length = a.length;
    if (orig_length >= N) return;
    a.length = N;
    a.length = orig_length;
}

"Jarrett Billingsley" <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> writes:

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Big Bill <bigdorkyb tengu.com> wrote:
 i just wonder here,

 free(x); will free contents of x, but will x.length=0 free memory too?

free(x) doesn't clear the contents of x.  In fact it's completely
illegal and I'm surprised your compiler allows it.  Not only can
arrays not be implicitly cast to pointers, but free() is a C stdlib
function, and using free() to free memory allocated by the D GC is a
terrible idea.

Did you mean "delete x;"?

"Bill Baxter" <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Jarrett Billingsley
<jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Big Bill <bigdorkyb tengu.com> wrote:
 i just wonder here,

 free(x); will free contents of x, but will x.length=0 free memory too?

 free(x) doesn't clear the contents of x.  In fact it's completely
 illegal and I'm surprised your compiler allows it.  Not only can
 arrays not be implicitly cast to pointers, but free() is a C stdlib
 function, and using free() to free memory allocated by the D GC is a
 terrible idea.

 Did you mean "delete x;"?

And if you want to let the GC handle it, then

    x = null;

For some reason I completely missed that free(x) in the original mail.
 Yeh, free() on a D array is not right.

--bb