• Ellery Newcomer (4/4) Dec 03 2010 I might just be having one of those moments, but if static arrays are
• Simen kjaeraas (4/8) Dec 03 2010 That's what it does. Not a deep value copy, of course, but a value copy.
• bearophile (5/6) Dec 05 2010 See also:

Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newcomer utulsa.edu> writes:

I might just be having one of those moments, but if static arrays are 
value types, doesn't it make more sense that

arr1 = arr2;

performs a value copy than a reference copy?

"Simen kjaeraas" <simen.kjaras gmail.com> writes:

Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newcomer utulsa.edu> wrote:

 I might just be having one of those moments, but if static arrays are  
 value types, doesn't it make more sense that

 arr1 = arr2;

 performs a value copy than a reference copy?

That's what it does. Not a deep value copy, of course, but a value copy.

-- 
Simen

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Simen kjaeraas:

 That's what it does. Not a deep value copy, of course, but a value copy.

See also:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971

Bye,
bearophile