www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - druntime

reply Hoenir <mrmocool gmx.de> writes:
Are there any information about druntime?
The D2.0 changelog states Phobos was split with v2.020 but there are no 
information about that for D1.

I'm especially interested in using a library based on Tango while using 
Phobos in the application itself (e.g. using the new DWT)
Jan 16 2009
parent reply torhu <no spam.invalid> writes:
On 16.01.2009 15:39, Hoenir wrote:
 Are there any information about druntime?
 The D2.0 changelog states Phobos was split with v2.020 but there are no
 information about that for D1.

 I'm especially interested in using a library based on Tango while using
 Phobos in the application itself (e.g. using the new DWT)
Druntime is only used for phobos 2 currently, not for 1. So there won't be any further phobos/tango compatibility until tango is ported to D 2.0. And then dwt has to be ported too. The closest you can get is using tangobos, which phobos modified to run on top of tango. Probably better to just learn tango.
Jan 16 2009
next sibling parent reply Hoenir <mrmocool gmx.de> writes:
torhu schrieb:
 Druntime is only used for phobos 2 currently, not for 1.  So there won't 
 be any further phobos/tango compatibility until tango is ported to D 
 2.0.  And then dwt has to be ported too.
 
 The closest you can get is using tangobos, which phobos modified to run 
 on top of tango.  Probably better to just learn tango.
Yeah, officially. But there also is a D1 branch of druntime and there are even build instructions for 1.x. So why don't they port tango to that D1 version of druntime?
Jan 16 2009
parent reply "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:
"Hoenir" wrote
 torhu schrieb:
 Druntime is only used for phobos 2 currently, not for 1.  So there won't 
 be any further phobos/tango compatibility until tango is ported to D 2.0. 
 And then dwt has to be ported too.

 The closest you can get is using tangobos, which phobos modified to run 
 on top of tango.  Probably better to just learn tango.
Yeah, officially. But there also is a D1 branch of druntime and there are even build instructions for 1.x. So why don't they port tango to that D1 version of druntime?
What is the need? The very purpose of having druntime in the first place is to have Tango and Phobos share a common runtime. If Tango is ported to druntime, then Phobos is *still* not compatible because Phobos 1 does not use it. Tango's runtime is pretty much exactly like druntime anyways, since druntime is a port of Tango's runtime. The only need I forsee is if the druntime 1.0 branch gets some enhancements that Tango needs to use. Once Tango for D2 is finished (being worked on, albeit very slowly), then druntime comes into play. -Steve
Jan 16 2009
next sibling parent reply Hoenir <mrmocool gmx.de> writes:
Steven Schveighoffer schrieb:
 Yeah, officially. But there also is a D1 branch of druntime and there are 
 even build instructions for 1.x.

 So why don't they port tango to that D1 version of druntime?
What is the need? The very purpose of having druntime in the first place is to have Tango and Phobos share a common runtime. If Tango is ported to druntime, then Phobos is *still* not compatible because Phobos 1 does not use it.
That's why one needs to rebuild phobos as the guideline states: http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/wiki/GettingStarted
 Tango's runtime is pretty much exactly like druntime anyways, since druntime 
 is a port of Tango's runtime.
 
 The only need I forsee is if the druntime 1.0 branch gets some enhancements 
 that Tango needs to use.
 
 Once Tango for D2 is finished (being worked on, albeit very slowly), then 
 druntime comes into play.
 
Any clues when this will be finished?
Jan 16 2009
parent reply "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:
"Hoenir" wrote
 Steven Schveighoffer schrieb:
 Yeah, officially. But there also is a D1 branch of druntime and there 
 are even build instructions for 1.x.

 So why don't they port tango to that D1 version of druntime?
What is the need? The very purpose of having druntime in the first place is to have Tango and Phobos share a common runtime. If Tango is ported to druntime, then Phobos is *still* not compatible because Phobos 1 does not use it.
That's why one needs to rebuild phobos as the guideline states: http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/wiki/GettingStarted
That guideline is for D2 phobos only. D1 phobos would need to be rewritten to use the new runtime, which as far as I know has not been done. (Sean, there probably should be a note stating this, as the doc is slightly ambiguous).
 Tango's runtime is pretty much exactly like druntime anyways, since 
 druntime is a port of Tango's runtime.

 The only need I forsee is if the druntime 1.0 branch gets some 
 enhancements that Tango needs to use.

 Once Tango for D2 is finished (being worked on, albeit very slowly), then 
 druntime comes into play.
Any clues when this will be finished?
When I get some more free time :( There is a branch that currently builds on Linux with dmd 2.019 (I haven't touched druntime yet, because I was waiting for it to stabilize). There have been many significant changes to the trunk since that was done, including a major io reorg, so you'd be still dealing with the old source (and possibly old bugs). -Steve
Jan 16 2009
parent Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> writes:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 "Hoenir" wrote
 Steven Schveighoffer schrieb:
 Yeah, officially. But there also is a D1 branch of druntime and there 
 are even build instructions for 1.x.

 So why don't they port tango to that D1 version of druntime?
What is the need? The very purpose of having druntime in the first place is to have Tango and Phobos share a common runtime. If Tango is ported to druntime, then Phobos is *still* not compatible because Phobos 1 does not use it.
That's why one needs to rebuild phobos as the guideline states: http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/wiki/GettingStarted
That guideline is for D2 phobos only. D1 phobos would need to be rewritten to use the new runtime, which as far as I know has not been done. (Sean, there probably should be a note stating this, as the doc is slightly ambiguous).
Yup. The rewrite would essentially be Tangobos anyway. I'll clarify the doc. Sean
Jan 16 2009
prev sibling parent Jason House <jason.james.house gmail.com> writes:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

 "Hoenir" wrote
 So why don't they port tango to that D1 version of druntime?
What is the need?
I can only think of one reason: When porting Tango to D2, it'll be one less thing to do.
Jan 19 2009
prev sibling parent Bill Baxter <wbaxter gmail.com> writes:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:28 AM, torhu <no spam.invalid> wrote:
 On 16.01.2009 15:39, Hoenir wrote:
 Are there any information about druntime?
 The D2.0 changelog states Phobos was split with v2.020 but there are no
 information about that for D1.

 I'm especially interested in using a library based on Tango while using
 Phobos in the application itself (e.g. using the new DWT)
Druntime is only used for phobos 2 currently, not for 1. So there won't be any further phobos/tango compatibility until tango is ported to D 2.0. And then dwt has to be ported too. The closest you can get is using tangobos, which phobos modified to run on top of tango. Probably better to just learn tango.
The Tangobos + Tango combo works just fine. I use it all the time. --bb
Jan 16 2009