www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - What is "dual-context" ?

reply SrMordred <patric.dexheimer gmail.com> writes:
source\app.d(37,10): Error: function `app.main.match!((some) => 
print(some), (none) => print("none")).match` requires a 
dual-context, which is not yet supported by LDC

I was playing with my home made "sumtypes".
The code below works fine in dmd, but in ldc it triggers that 
error.

x.match!(some => print(some), none => print("none"));


What exactly is this "dual-context"?
Sep 12 2019
parent reply Paul Backus <snarwin gmail.com> writes:
On Friday, 13 September 2019 at 02:49:33 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
 source\app.d(37,10): Error: function `app.main.match!((some) => 
 print(some), (none) => print("none")).match` requires a 
 dual-context, which is not yet supported by LDC

 I was playing with my home made "sumtypes".
 The code below works fine in dmd, but in ldc it triggers that 
 error.

 x.match!(some => print(some), none => print("none"));


 What exactly is this "dual-context"?
"Dual context" is the compiler feature that allows you to pass delegates as template arguments to member functions. For a long time, limitations in the frontend made this impossible [1]. It was recently fixed in dmd [2], but the fix hasn't made it into ldc yet [3], so code that takes advantage of this feature is currently dmd-only. The easiest way to work around the issue is to make `match` a non-member function, and call it using UFCS. This is what the dub package `sumtype` does [4]. [1] https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5710 [2] https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9282 [3] https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/3125 [4] https://github.com/pbackus/sumtype/blob/v0.8.13/src/sumtype.d#L1091-L1106
Sep 12 2019
parent SrMordred <patric.dexheimer gmail.com> writes:
On Friday, 13 September 2019 at 04:23:47 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
 On Friday, 13 September 2019 at 02:49:33 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
 [...]
"Dual context" is the compiler feature that allows you to pass delegates as template arguments to member functions. For a long time, limitations in the frontend made this impossible [1]. It was recently fixed in dmd [2], but the fix hasn't made it into ldc yet [3], so code that takes advantage of this feature is currently dmd-only. [...]
Nice!, Thanks for the explanation and workaround :)
Sep 13 2019