• "Malte =?UTF-8?B?S2llw59saW5nIg==?= <malte.kiessling mkalte.me> (28/28) Aug 02 2015 Hello,
• cym13 (11/40) Aug 05 2015 I'm not quite sure why you're trying to use rdmd to build shared

"Malte =?UTF-8?B?S2llw59saW5nIg==?= <malte.kiessling mkalte.me> writes:

Hello,

I am trying to use rdmd to create shared object files.
The command that I am using is

"rdmd --build-only -shared -fPIC -defaultlib= foo.d"

This creates a file called "foo" - wich is not exactly what I 
expectd.
However

"dmd -shared -fPIC -defaultlib= foo.d "

creates a file called "foo.so" - that is what i expect and need.
The command ill be actually using will be similar to this:

"find ../script -name *.d -exec dmd -I../../deps/ -I../../source/ 
-fPIC -shared -debug -g -defaultlib= {} \;"

The amount of files that will be compiled by this are really 
likely going to increase over time, so using rdmd here would be 
nice in terms of compile time.

The issues i have is that rdmd dosnt create .so files but (at 
least on my linux) creates them without a file exenstion. I could 
rename them with -of but that would increase this ugly 
find-command even more. The second thing (wich isnt such a big 
issue): I have to use "--build-only" for rdmd because it will try 
to run the newly created shared object.

Also, not so on-topic to be asked here: Is there a nicer solution 
for the "all .d files in this directory and the ones below"?
I remeber its possible to do something like

"dmd ./**/*.d"

but I cant get that to work...

Thanks
Malte

"cym13" <cpicard openmailbox.org> writes:

On Sunday, 2 August 2015 at 19:04:15 UTC, Malte Kießling wrote:
 Hello,

 I am trying to use rdmd to create shared object files.
 The command that I am using is

 "rdmd --build-only -shared -fPIC -defaultlib= foo.d"

 This creates a file called "foo" - wich is not exactly what I 
 expectd.
 However

 "dmd -shared -fPIC -defaultlib= foo.d "

 creates a file called "foo.so" - that is what i expect and need.
 The command ill be actually using will be similar to this:

 "find ../script -name *.d -exec dmd -I../../deps/ 
 -I../../source/ -fPIC -shared -debug -g -defaultlib= {} \;"

 The amount of files that will be compiled by this are really 
 likely going to increase over time, so using rdmd here would be 
 nice in terms of compile time.

 The issues i have is that rdmd dosnt create .so files but (at 
 least on my linux) creates them without a file exenstion. I 
 could rename them with -of but that would increase this ugly 
 find-command even more. The second thing (wich isnt such a big 
 issue): I have to use "--build-only" for rdmd because it will 
 try to run the newly created shared object.

 Also, not so on-topic to be asked here: Is there a nicer 
 solution for the "all .d files in this directory and the ones 
 below"?
 I remeber its possible to do something like

 "dmd ./**/*.d"

 but I cant get that to work...

 Thanks
 Malte

I'm not quite sure why you're trying to use rdmd to build shared 
object files... rdmd is designed to run programs, not to build 
libraries. That's why it won't put a .so extension, it just 
(AFAIK) isn't designed for shared libraries. So why are you 
trying to use it instead of dmd?

Besides, extensive glob (the "./**/*" thing) is shell dependant, 
I'm not sure it is possible on bash, it may be zsh-only. You 
could however do (assuming you're on an UNIX system) “ find . 
-name "*.d" | xargs dmd <your_options> ” where “find” finds .d 
files and xargs passes them as argument to dmd.