digitalmars.D.learn - "Symbol undefined" on interface with public getter and package setter
- TSalm (31/31) Feb 20 2009 Hello,
- TSalm (19/50) Feb 20 2009 It seems this comes only from the "package" method.
- Jacob Carlborg (2/44) Feb 20 2009 I'm not sure but I think package is not virtual.
- Jarrett Billingsley (2/3) Feb 20 2009 The compiler should catch that then.
- grauzone (3/3) Feb 23 2009 Last time I checked I could even use "override" to... erm, override
- TSalm (3/4) Feb 20 2009 :-(
- Daniel Keep (6/12) Feb 20 2009 You also can't have a private function in an interface. This once lost
- TSalm (4/15) Feb 21 2009 What a pity :(
- Ellery Newcomer (2/16) Feb 23 2009 Double thanks! I ran into this issue just a day or two ago.
Hello, When I compile the code below, I've got the following error : OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2004 All rights reserved. private_method_in_interface_file3.obj(private_method_in_interface_file3) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D33private_method_in_interface_file31I4funcMFiZv --- errorlevel 1 /* ----- CODE ------ */ interface I { int func() ; package void func(int); } class A:I { int i; package void func(int i) { this.i = i; } int func() { return i; } } void main() { I a = new A ; a.func = 10 ; Stdout(a.func).newline ; } /* --- END CODE ---- */ Thanks in advance for your help, TSalm
Feb 20 2009
It seems this comes only from the "package" method. The error is the same with this code : /* --- CODE --- */ interface I { package void setFunc(int); } class A:I { int i; package void setFunc(int i) { this.i = i ; } } void main() { I a = new A; a.setFunc = 10; } /* --- END CODE --- */Hello, When I compile the code below, I've got the following error : OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2004 All rights reserved. private_method_in_interface_file3.obj(private_method_in_interface_file3) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D33private_method_in_interface_file31I4funcMFiZv --- errorlevel 1 /* ----- CODE ------ */ interface I { int func() ; package void func(int); } class A:I { int i; package void func(int i) { this.i = i; } int func() { return i; } } void main() { I a = new A ; a.func = 10 ; Stdout(a.func).newline ; } /* --- END CODE ---- */ Thanks in advance for your help, TSalm
Feb 20 2009
TSalm wrote:Hello, When I compile the code below, I've got the following error : OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2004 All rights reserved. private_method_in_interface_file3.obj(private_method_in_interface_file3) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D33private_method_in_interface_file31I4funcMFiZv --- errorlevel 1 /* ----- CODE ------ */ interface I { int func() ; package void func(int); } class A:I { int i; package void func(int i) { this.i = i; } int func() { return i; } } void main() { I a = new A ; a.func = 10 ; Stdout(a.func).newline ; } /* --- END CODE ---- */ Thanks in advance for your help, TSalmI'm not sure but I think package is not virtual.
Feb 20 2009
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> wrote:I'm not sure but I think package is not virtual.The compiler should catch that then.
Feb 20 2009
Last time I checked I could even use "override" to... erm, override methods that had package protection. The compiler didn't even complain, and I had to find out the hard way that the method wasn't virtual.
Feb 23 2009
I'm not sure but I think package is not virtual.:-( So there's really no way to have a method declared "package" in an interface ?
Feb 20 2009
TSalm wrote:You also can't have a private function in an interface. This once lost me four days trying to figure out why my program wouldn't link despite the function very obviously being there. Stick to public functions only. -- DanielI'm not sure but I think package is not virtual.:-( So there's really no way to have a method declared "package" in an interface ?
Feb 20 2009
Le Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:00:42 +0100, Daniel Keep <daniel.keep.lists gmail.com> a écrit:TSalm wrote:What a pity :( Thanks.You also can't have a private function in an interface. This once lost me four days trying to figure out why my program wouldn't link despite the function very obviously being there. Stick to public functions only.I'm not sure but I think package is not virtual.:-( So there's really no way to have a method declared "package" in an interface ?
Feb 21 2009
Daniel Keep wrote:TSalm wrote:Double thanks! I ran into this issue just a day or two ago.You also can't have a private function in an interface. This once lost me four days trying to figure out why my program wouldn't link despite the function very obviously being there. Stick to public functions only. -- DanielI'm not sure but I think package is not virtual.:-( So there's really no way to have a method declared "package" in an interface ?
Feb 23 2009