• Kozzi11 (17/17) Jul 31 2014 Is possible to somehow split class declaration and definition.
• FreeSlave (3/20) Jul 31 2014 dmd -c -o- -H yourmodule.d
• Kozzi11 (14/38) Jul 31 2014 I know that, but this is not exactly what I mean. I mean
• Kagamin (6/16) Jul 31 2014 This is usually done by generating functions in the classes
• Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-learn (4/24) Jul 31 2014 V Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:26:38 +0000
• bearophile (5/22) Jul 31 2014 I think this is currently not possible. (And I don't like it in

"Kozzi11" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:

Is possible to somehow split class declaration and definition.

I mean something like this:

class C
{
     void hello(); // just prototype
}

class C
{
     void hello()
     {
         //actual code
     }
}

or something like this
void C.hello() {
     //actual code
}

"FreeSlave" <freeslave93 gmail.com> writes:

On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 11:34:38 UTC, Kozzi11 wrote:
 Is possible to somehow split class declaration and definition.

 I mean something like this:

 class C
 {
     void hello(); // just prototype
 }

 class C
 {
     void hello()
     {
         //actual code
     }
 }

 or something like this
 void C.hello() {
     //actual code
 }

dmd -c -o- -H yourmodule.d

will create .di file (i.e. interface)

"Kozzi11" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:

On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 11:41:07 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
 On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 11:34:38 UTC, Kozzi11 wrote:
 Is possible to somehow split class declaration and definition.

 I mean something like this:

 class C
 {
    void hello(); // just prototype
 }

 class C
 {
    void hello()
    {
        //actual code
    }
 }

 or something like this
 void C.hello() {
    //actual code
 }

 dmd -c -o- -H yourmodule.d

 will create .di file (i.e. interface)

I know that, but this is not exactly what I mean. I mean 
something like this: http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP47 .
I will have something like:

module m;
 someUda
class C {
     void someFun();
}

 someUda
class D {
     void anotherFun();
}

mixin(generateFunDefForClassesWithSomeUda!m);

"Kagamin" <spam here.lot> writes:

On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 12:02:22 UTC, Kozzi11 wrote:
 module m;
  someUda
 class C {
     void someFun();
 }

  someUda
 class D {
     void anotherFun();
 }

 mixin(generateFunDefForClassesWithSomeUda!m);

This is usually done by generating functions in the classes 
directly.

class C {
     mixin Generate!"C";
}

Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> writes:

V Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:26:38 +0000
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com>
napsáno:

 On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 12:02:22 UTC, Kozzi11 wrote:
 module m;
  someUda
 class C {
     void someFun();
 }

  someUda
 class D {
     void anotherFun();
 }

 mixin(generateFunDefForClassesWithSomeUda!m);

 
 This is usually done by generating functions in the classes 
 directly.
 
 class C {
      mixin Generate!"C";
 }

Yes this is how I do it now.

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Kozzi11:

 Is possible to somehow split class declaration and definition.

 I mean something like this:

 class C
 {
     void hello(); // just prototype
 }

 class C
 {
     void hello()
     {
         //actual code
     }
 }

 or something like this
 void C.hello() {
     //actual code
 }

I think this is currently not possible. (And I don't like it in 
D).

Bye,
bearophile