• Chris Williams (24/24) Aug 10 2010 I would like to be able to do something like this:
• Steven Schveighoffer (5/32) Aug 10 2010 I think memmove should be fine. All thread stacks are scanned during GC...

Chris Williams <aahz seanet.com> writes:

I would like to be able to do something like this:

class A {
	int i;
}

int main() {
	A[] list;

	for (uint L = 0; L < 3; L++) {
		for (uint L2 = 0; L2 < 3; L2++) {
			uint index = L + L2;

			uint copyAmount = list.length - index;
			list.length = list.length + 1;
			if (copyAmount > 0) {  // Move data after index one slot later to make room
				A[] sliceFrom = list[index .. (index + copyAmount)];
				A[] sliceTo = list[(index + 1) .. (index + 1 + copyAmount)];
				sliceTo[] = sliceFrom[];
			}
			list[index] = new A();
			list[index].i = index;
		}
	}

	return 0;
}

I have a running implementation which uses C's memmove(), but I gather that
this isn't a safe means to do it as the garbage collector
might run while the references to the object are being manipulated. Is there a
way to do this outside of a loop?

"Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:

On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:01:28 -0400, Chris Williams <aahz seanet.com> wrote:

 I would like to be able to do something like this:

 class A {
 	int i;
 }

 int main() {
 	A[] list;

 	for (uint L = 0; L < 3; L++) {
 		for (uint L2 = 0; L2 < 3; L2++) {
 			uint index = L + L2;

 			uint copyAmount = list.length - index;
 			list.length = list.length + 1;
 			if (copyAmount > 0) {  // Move data after index one slot later to  
 make room
 				A[] sliceFrom = list[index .. (index + copyAmount)];
 				A[] sliceTo = list[(index + 1) .. (index + 1 + copyAmount)];
 				sliceTo[] = sliceFrom[];
 			}
 			list[index] = new A();
 			list[index].i = index;
 		}
 	}

 	return 0;
 }

 I have a running implementation which uses C's memmove(), but I gather  
 that this isn't a safe means to do it as the garbage collector
 might run while the references to the object are being manipulated. Is  
 there a way to do this outside of a loop?

I think memmove should be fine.  All thread stacks are scanned during GC  
cycles, so there is no danger of having one element get collected.  I  
think memmove will not copy half a reference anyways.

-Steve