• Russel Winder (16/16) Apr 08 2013 Given that the entire C++ standards committee will be at ACCU 2013, I've
• Jesse Phillips (5/13) Apr 08 2013 That is great. Just remember your audience, they will be looking

Russel Winder <russel winder.org.uk> writes:

Given that the entire C++ standards committee will be at ACCU 2013, I've
decided to do a lightning talk on why D and Go are better tools for any
native coding problem than C++.

	pigeon[500] pigeons;
	pigeons[random(500)] =3D new cat;

:-)
--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

"Jesse Phillips" <Jessekphillips+D gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 8 April 2013 at 14:20:11 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
 Given that the entire C++ standards committee will be at ACCU 
 2013, I've
 decided to do a lightning talk on why D and Go are better tools 
 for any
 native coding problem than C++.

 	pigeon[500] pigeons;
 	pigeons[random(500)] = new cat;

 :-)

That is great. Just remember your audience, they will be looking 
for what C++ can get out of it. You'll want to keep them happy so 
they don't disregard everything (not that they are the type to do 
so, someone will be)