digitalmars.D.learn - Interface to C page has been screwed up a little
- Andrej Mitrovic (24/24) Aug 05 2011 http://d-programming-language.org/interfaceToC.html
- Jacob Carlborg (4/28) Aug 05 2011 Yes.
http://d-programming-language.org/interfaceToC.html Originally the table just showed D and C types, the 32/64 bit columns weren't there. On my last commit I had this: D type | C type c_long (in core.stdc.config) | long c_ulong (in core.stdc.config) | unsigned long long | long long ulong | unsigned long long But now this table seems to have been mixed up and 32/64 bit columns added, and c_long magically disappeared: D type | C 32bit | C 64 bit long | long long | long c_ulong (in core.stdc.config) | ulong ulong | unsigned long long | unsigned long As far as I know, the correct table should be without those 32/64 bit columns and instead be this: D type | C type: c_long (in core.stdc.config) | long c_ulong (in core.stdc.config) | unsigned long long | long long ulong | unsigned long long C's long and unsigned long might be different on Windows and Linux 32 and 64 bit versions, hence c_long and c_ulong from core.stdc.config. Is my interpretation correct, so I can make a pull to fix this?
Aug 05 2011
On 2011-08-05 20:36, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:http://d-programming-language.org/interfaceToC.html Originally the table just showed D and C types, the 32/64 bit columns weren't there. On my last commit I had this: D type | C type c_long (in core.stdc.config) | long c_ulong (in core.stdc.config) | unsigned long long | long long ulong | unsigned long long But now this table seems to have been mixed up and 32/64 bit columns added, and c_long magically disappeared: D type | C 32bit | C 64 bit long | long long | long c_ulong (in core.stdc.config) | ulong ulong | unsigned long long | unsigned long As far as I know, the correct table should be without those 32/64 bit columns and instead be this: D type | C type: c_long (in core.stdc.config) | long c_ulong (in core.stdc.config) | unsigned long long | long long ulong | unsigned long long C's long and unsigned long might be different on Windows and Linux 32 and 64 bit versions, hence c_long and c_ulong from core.stdc.config. Is my interpretation correct, so I can make a pull to fix this?Yes. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Aug 05 2011