• Vinod K Chandran (21/21) Apr 24 2022 Hi all,
• =?UTF-8?Q?Ali_=c3=87ehreli?= (17/18) Apr 24 2022 Looks good to me.
• Vinod K Chandran (3/5) Apr 25 2022 Thanks a lot. All I wanted to implement more than ctor with
• bauss (3/24) Apr 25 2022 Yes and in addition to Ali's message then remember it's private
• bauss (4/32) Apr 25 2022 Oops typo.
• Vinod K Chandran (3/10) Apr 25 2022 Thanks for the reply. Got it. All I wanted to implement more than

Vinod K Chandran <kcvinu82 gmail.com> writes:

Hi all,
Please take a look at this code. Is this the right way to use 
private constructors ?
```d
class Foo {
     int p1 ;
     string p2 ;
     bool p3 ;

     private this(int a, string b, bool c) {
         this.p1 = a
         this.p2 = b
         this.p3 = c
     }

     this(int a) {
         this(a, "some string", true);
     }

     this(int a, string b) {
         this(a, b, true);
     }
}
```

=?UTF-8?Q?Ali_=c3=87ehreli?= <acehreli yahoo.com> writes:

On 4/24/22 17:18, Vinod K Chandran wrote:

      private this(int a, string b, bool c) {

Looks good to me.

There are other ways as well:

class Foo {
private:
   // ...

public:
   // ...
}

Or:

class Foo {
   private {
     // ...
   }

   // ...
}

Ali

Vinod K Chandran <kcvinu82 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 02:22:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
 Looks good to me.
 There are other ways as well:

Thanks a lot. All I wanted to implement more than ctor with 
different parameters and avoid code duplication.

bauss <jj_1337 live.dk> writes:

On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 00:18:03 UTC, Vinod K Chandran wrote:
 Hi all,
 Please take a look at this code. Is this the right way to use 
 private constructors ?
 ```d
 class Foo {
     int p1 ;
     string p2 ;
     bool p3 ;

     private this(int a, string b, bool c) {
         this.p1 = a
         this.p2 = b
         this.p3 = c
     }

     this(int a) {
         this(a, "some string", true);
     }

     this(int a, string b) {
         this(a, b, true);
     }
 }
 ```

Yes and in addition to Ali's message then remember it's private 
for the module only.

bauss <jj_1337 live.dk> writes:

On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 07:18:44 UTC, bauss wrote:
 On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 00:18:03 UTC, Vinod K Chandran 
 wrote:
 Hi all,
 Please take a look at this code. Is this the right way to use 
 private constructors ?
 ```d
 class Foo {
     int p1 ;
     string p2 ;
     bool p3 ;

     private this(int a, string b, bool c) {
         this.p1 = a
         this.p2 = b
         this.p3 = c
     }

     this(int a) {
         this(a, "some string", true);
     }

     this(int a, string b) {
         this(a, b, true);
     }
 }
 ```

 Yes and in addition to Ali's message then remember it's private 
 for the module only.

Oops typo.

What I meant is that private is module level, so it's __not__ 
private in the module, but it is for other modules.

Vinod K Chandran <kcvinu82 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 07:19:31 UTC, bauss wrote:
 Yes and in addition to Ali's message then remember it's 
 private for the module only.

 Oops typo.

 What I meant is that private is module level, so it's __not__ 
 private in the module, but it is for other modules.

Thanks for the reply. Got it. All I wanted to implement more than 
ctor with different parameters and avoid code duplication.