• Biga (6/6) Jan 10 2010 It was fun to implement the subj.

Biga <bigasoft gmail.com> writes:

It was fun to implement the subj.

At first, I wrote it using ParameterTypeTuple!() template. Hence, no storage
classes (ref, out, lazy etc.) are supported. But it works.

http://paste.dprogramming.com/dplyvf4d

---

Then I was suggested to implement the same thing by means of parsing function
type .stringof, which contains full function declaration (including storage
classes). So I did this. This version supports storage classes, but it won't
work if there are functions with default parameters or variadics. My lame
parser doesn't support such things, but I guess it's possible to implement them
as well.

http://paste.dprogramming.com/dpnpgcdm