www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - 2.058 broke my build. Is this a bug?

reply Caligo <iteronvexor gmail.com> writes:
----------------8<----------------8<----------------

import std.datetime : benchmark;
import std.stdio : writefln;

struct A(int r, int c){

 public:
  alias float[r * c] Data;

  Data _data;

  auto opBinary(A a){
    float t;
    foreach(i; 0..r*c)
      foreach(j; 0..r*c)
	t += this[i,j];
    return a;
  }
  pure float opIndex(size_t rr, size_t cc = 0) const{ return _data[cc
+ rr * c]; }

  pure ref float opIndex(size_t rr, size_t cc = 0){ return _data[cc + rr * c]; }
}

void bench(alias fun)(string msg, uint n = 1_000_000){

  auto b = benchmark!fun(n);
  writefln(" %s %s ms", msg, b[0].to!("msecs", int));
}

unittest{

  alias A!(3, 3) AA;
  AA a;

  bench!( {auto r = a * a;})("broken");
}

void main(){ }

---------------->8---------------->8----------------

Other parts of my code using bench() works fine, except in rare cases.
 So I'm guessing this is a bug?  I can't tell if it's in DMD or
std.datetime.  Can anyone help?

I will bug report myself tomorrow if it turns out to be a bug for sure.

DMD 2.058, 64-bit GNU/Linux
Feb 23 2012
parent reply Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:
On 24.02.2012 10:28, Caligo wrote:

 ----------------8<----------------8<----------------

 import std.datetime : benchmark;
 import std.stdio : writefln;

 struct A(int r, int c){

   public:
    alias float[r * c] Data;

    Data _data;

    auto opBinary(A a){
      float t;
      foreach(i; 0..r*c)
        foreach(j; 0..r*c)
 	t += this[i,j];


I guess that should be
foreach(i; 0..r)
	foreach(j; 0..c)
		t += this[i,j];
since you do row/col multiplication in opIndex?


      return a;
    }
    pure float opIndex(size_t rr, size_t cc = 0) const{ return _data[cc
 + rr * c]; }

    pure ref float opIndex(size_t rr, size_t cc = 0){ return _data[cc + rr *
c]; }
 }

 void bench(alias fun)(string msg, uint n = 1_000_000){

    auto b = benchmark!fun(n);
    writefln(" %s %s ms", msg, b[0].to!("msecs", int));
 }

 unittest{

    alias A!(3, 3) AA;
    AA a;

    bench!( {auto r = a * a;})("broken");
 }

 void main(){ }

 ---------------->8---------------->8----------------

 Other parts of my code using bench() works fine, except in rare cases.
   So I'm guessing this is a bug?  I can't tell if it's in DMD or
 std.datetime.  Can anyone help?

 I will bug report myself tomorrow if it turns out to be a bug for sure.

 DMD 2.058, 64-bit GNU/Linux



-- 
Dmitry Olshansky
Feb 24 2012
next sibling parent Caligo <iteronvexor gmail.com> writes:
That was a typo, and it doesn't change anything.  Here is a shorter version:

----------------8<----------------8<----------------
import std.datetime;
import std.stdio;

struct A{

  auto fun(A a){ return 0; }
}

void bench(alias fun)(string msg, uint n = 1_000_000){

  auto b = benchmark!fun(n);
  writefln(" %s %s ms", msg, b[0].to!("msecs", int));
}

unittest{

  A a, b;

  void test1(){
    auto r = a.fun(b);
  }

  bench!( {auto r = a.fun(b);} )("Does Not work");
  bench!(test1)("Works");
}

void main(){ }
---------------->8---------------->8----------------



And here is the error:

/usr/include/d/dmd/phobos/std/datetime.d(30986): Error: safe function
'benchmark' cannot call system delegate '__lambda1'
t1.d(11): Error: template instance
t1.__unittest2.benchmark!(__lambda1) error instantiating
t1.d(23):        instantiated from here: bench!(delegate  system void()
{
int r = a.fun(b);
}
)
t1.d(23): Error: template instance t1.__unittest2.bench!(delegate  system void()
{
int r = a.fun(b);
}
) error instantiating
Feb 24 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent James Miller <james aatch.net> writes:
On Feb 25, 2012 12:16 PM, "Caligo" <iteronvexor gmail.com> wrote:

 That was a typo, and it doesn't change anything.  Here is a shorter


version:

 ----------------8<----------------8<----------------
 import std.datetime;
 import std.stdio;

 struct A{

  auto fun(A a){ return 0; }
 }

 void bench(alias fun)(string msg, uint n = 1_000_000){

  auto b = benchmark!fun(n);
  writefln(" %s %s ms", msg, b[0].to!("msecs", int));
 }

 unittest{

  A a, b;

  void test1(){
    auto r = a.fun(b);
  }

  bench!( {auto r = a.fun(b);} )("Does Not work");
  bench!(test1)("Works");
 }

 void main(){ }
 ---------------->8---------------->8----------------



 And here is the error:

 /usr/include/d/dmd/phobos/std/datetime.d(30986): Error: safe function
 'benchmark' cannot call system delegate '__lambda1'
 t1.d(11): Error: template instance
 t1.__unittest2.benchmark!(__lambda1) error instantiating
 t1.d(23):        instantiated from here: bench!(delegate  system void()
 {
 int r = a.fun(b);
 }
 )
 t1.d(23): Error: template instance t1.__unittest2.bench!(delegate  system


void()

 {
 int r = a.fun(b);
 }
 ) error instantiating


Hmm it seems that the delegate is being implicitly marked as system, and im
not sure why benchmark is  safe. I'd say file a bug report.
Feb 24 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent Caligo <iteronvexor gmail.com> writes:
Is there another workaround than the one I've posted?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7577

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:44 PM, James Miller <james aatch.net> wrote:

 Hmm it seems that the delegate is being implicitly marked as system, and im
 not sure why benchmark is  safe. I'd say file a bug report.
Feb 24 2012
prev sibling parent Caligo <iteronvexor gmail.com> writes:
I found another workaround: mark the module as trusted.
Feb 24 2012