• Sebastian Wilzbach via Dlang-internal (57/57) Jun 05 2017 Hi all,
• Stefan Koch (3/13) Jun 05 2017 Let's keep them.
• Mathias Lang (4/61) Jun 06 2017 I think a good cleanup is in order. The DMD branch of D1 have to
• Rainer Schuetze (4/9) Jun 11 2017 I've just removed this one. It was probably created when submitting a PR...
• Vladimir Panteleev (9/11) Jul 21 2017 FYI, I've just cleaned up the tags a bit:

Sebastian Wilzbach via Dlang-internal <dlang-internal puremagic.com> writes:

Hi all,

Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, Druntime and 
Phobos?
GitHub defines a branch stale if it hasn't been updated within the last 
three months.
The 2.06X branches are tagged anyways, so I assume they are just an 
relict from old times?
Are there any other branches except for newCTFE, dmd-1.x, D1.0, and 
phobos-1.x that are necessary?

Cheers,

Seb


DMD
===

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/branches/stale

2.061
2.062
2.063
2.064
2.065
2.066
revert-3761-issue13116
2.067
revert-5744-refactor_attrib
MartinNowak-patch-1
revert-6217-ddmd-symlink
rainers-patch-1

Druntime
========

https://github.com/dlang/druntime/branches/stale


D1.0
CDGC
2.061
2.062
2.063
2.064
2.065
2.066
2.067
newCTFE

Phobos
======

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/branches/stale

2.061
2.062
2.063
2.064
2.065
2.066
2.067
phobos-1.x
changelog_filelogger_default_loglevel
revert-3995-bigint_bounds
revert-3859-getopt-checker
walter_andrei_action_list
faster_front
revert-5087-logger-uselessfinal
newCTFE

Stefan Koch <uplink.coder googlemail.com> writes:

On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 19:35:58 UTC, Sebastian Wilzbach wrote:
 Hi all,

 Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, 
 Druntime and Phobos?
 GitHub defines a branch stale if it hasn't been updated within 
 the last three months.
 The 2.06X branches are tagged anyways, so I assume they are 
 just an relict from old times?
 Are there any other branches except for newCTFE, dmd-1.x, D1.0, 
 and phobos-1.x that are necessary?

 [...]

Let's keep them.
I hate change.

Mathias Lang <mathias.lang sociomantic.com> writes:

On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 19:35:58 UTC, Sebastian Wilzbach wrote:
 Hi all,

 Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, 
 Druntime and Phobos?
 GitHub defines a branch stale if it hasn't been updated within 
 the last three months.
 The 2.06X branches are tagged anyways, so I assume they are 
 just an relict from old times?
 Are there any other branches except for newCTFE, dmd-1.x, D1.0, 
 and phobos-1.x that are necessary?

 Cheers,

 Seb


 DMD
 ===

 https://github.com/dlang/dmd/branches/stale

 2.061
 2.062
 2.063
 2.064
 2.065
 2.066
 revert-3761-issue13116
 2.067
 revert-5744-refactor_attrib
 MartinNowak-patch-1
 revert-6217-ddmd-symlink
 rainers-patch-1

 Druntime
 ========

 https://github.com/dlang/druntime/branches/stale


 D1.0
 CDGC
 2.061
 2.062
 2.063
 2.064
 2.065
 2.066
 2.067
 newCTFE

 Phobos
 ======

 https://github.com/dlang/phobos/branches/stale

 2.061
 2.062
 2.063
 2.064
 2.065
 2.066
 2.067
 phobos-1.x
 changelog_filelogger_default_loglevel
 revert-3995-bigint_bounds
 revert-3859-getopt-checker
 walter_andrei_action_list
 faster_front
 revert-5087-logger-uselessfinal
 newCTFE

I think a good cleanup is in order. The DMD branch of D1 have to 
be kept, but the one in phobos and druntime can be killed AFAIK. 
You can ask Luca / Mihails for confirmation.

Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> writes:

On 05.06.2017 21:35, Sebastian Wilzbach via Dlang-internal wrote:
 DMD
 ===
 
 https://github.com/dlang/dmd/branches/stale

[...]
 rainers-patch-1

I've just removed this one. It was probably created when submitting a PR 
via the github interface: it preferred dlang instead of my personal account.

Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow.lists gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 19:35:58 UTC, Sebastian Wilzbach wrote:
 Is anyone opposed to cleaning up the branch mess at DMD, 
 Druntime and Phobos?

FYI, I've just cleaned up the tags a bit:

- Deleted the tag "v" from dlang.org
- Deleted the tag "vv2.059" from installer
- Deleted the tags "1.024" and "2.008" from phobos (they were 
redundant as the tags "phobos-1.024" and "phobos-2.008" also 
existed)
- Renamed the tag "phobos1-1.067" to "phobos-1.067" to correspond 
to the existing naming scheme.