• Bruno Medeiros (7/7) Aug 30 2013 Something for the weekend:
• ilya-stromberg (2/9) Sep 02 2013 Does DLTK (Dynamic Languages Toolkit) 3.0 still supported?
• Bruno Medeiros (4/14) Sep 02 2013 No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .
• eles (3/7) Sep 02 2013 What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug
• Bruno Medeiros (9/15) Sep 02 2013 Nothing, it is just a task no one has approached yet.
• Ary Borenszweig (4/18) Sep 02 2013 Did you consider reusing some code from Descent for the debugger? I
• Bruno Medeiros (7/28) Sep 03 2013 I did consider that, but I haven't had the time yet to look into any of

Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+dng gmail.com> writes:

Something for the weekend:

A new version of DDT - D Development Tools is out.
Some minor improvements and some important fixes. Please take the time 
to read the Changelog:

http://code.google.com/p/ddt/wiki/ChangeLog#DDT_0.8.0_%282013-08-30%29

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer

"ilya-stromberg" <ilya-stromberg-2009 yandex.ru> writes:

On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 Something for the weekend:

 A new version of DDT - D Development Tools is out.
 Some minor improvements and some important fixes. Please take 
 the time to read the Changelog:

 http://code.google.com/p/ddt/wiki/ChangeLog#DDT_0.8.0_%282013-08-30%29

 Updated DDT to latest version of DLTK (version 5.0, from 
 Eclipse Kepler).

Does DLTK (Dynamic Languages Toolkit) 3.0 still supported?

Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+dng gmail.com> writes:

On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 Something for the weekend:

 A new version of DDT - D Development Tools is out.
 Some minor improvements and some important fixes. Please take the time
 to read the Changelog:

 http://code.google.com/p/ddt/wiki/ChangeLog#DDT_0.8.0_%282013-08-30%29

 Updated DDT to latest version of DLTK (version 5.0, from Eclipse Kepler).

 Does DLTK (Dynamic Languages Toolkit) 3.0 still supported?

No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer

"eles" <eles eles.com> writes:

On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:42:41 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros 
 wrote:

 No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug 
interface?

Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+dng gmail.com> writes:

On 02/09/2013 12:38, eles wrote:
 On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:42:41 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:

 No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

 What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug interface?

Nothing, it is just a task no one has approached yet.
I'm the only developer contributing so far, and I've been tied up with 
other more tasks I considered more prioritary. (the new parser, updating 
to latest Eclipse/DLTK release, etc.)

There is a few improvements I want to make to the Code Completion 
engine, after that I should go to tackle debugger integration.

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer

Ary Borenszweig <ary esperanto.org.ar> writes:

On 9/2/13 2:02 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 12:38, eles wrote:
 On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:42:41 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:

 No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

 What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug interface?

 Nothing, it is just a task no one has approached yet.
 I'm the only developer contributing so far, and I've been tied up with
 other more tasks I considered more prioritary. (the new parser, updating
 to latest Eclipse/DLTK release, etc.)

 There is a few improvements I want to make to the Code Completion
 engine, after that I should go to tackle debugger integration.

Did you consider reusing some code from Descent for the debugger? I 
remember it was one part of the project that was separte from other 
parts and it worked quite well.

Bruno Medeiros <brunodomedeiros+dng gmail.com> writes:

On 02/09/2013 23:00, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
 On 9/2/13 2:02 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 12:38, eles wrote:
 On Monday, 2 September 2013 at 10:42:41 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
 On 02/09/2013 10:49, ilya-stromberg wrote:
 On Friday, 30 August 2013 at 17:46:19 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:

 No, it has to be the latest one only, 5.0 .

 What prevents integration with the gdb and Eclipse debug interface?

 Nothing, it is just a task no one has approached yet.
 I'm the only developer contributing so far, and I've been tied up with
 other more tasks I considered more prioritary. (the new parser, updating
 to latest Eclipse/DLTK release, etc.)

 There is a few improvements I want to make to the Code Completion
 engine, after that I should go to tackle debugger integration.

 Did you consider reusing some code from Descent for the debugger? I
 remember it was one part of the project that was separte from other
 parts and it worked quite well.

I did consider that, but I haven't had the time yet to look into any of 
the debugger functionality. (and I don't want to just blindly copy the 
code without at least understanding and testing it sufficiently - and 
that takes time...)

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer