• Brad Roberts (10/10) May 10 2009 A while ago the inbound mail into bugzilla from replies to this group br...
• Nick Sabalausky (5/19) May 10 2009 I didn't know there was ever such a feature :)
• Walter Bright (3/4) May 10 2009 I think it's useful and desirable, as otherwise there'll be two separate...

Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> writes:

A while ago the inbound mail into bugzilla from replies to this group broke.  I
figured out why, but the fix wasn't pleasant -- the perl code wasn't compatible
with a perl upgrade (5.8 -> 5.10).  The migration I did tonight ought to make it
possible for me to put that mechanism back together.. however I figured I'd take
a poll.

Who found it useful and/or desirable?

It's been disabled long enough that I figured I should see if it's worth
re-instating.

Thanks,
Brad

"Nick Sabalausky" <a a.a> writes:

"Brad Roberts" <braddr puremagic.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.33.1241944005.13405.digitalmars-d-bugs puremagic.com...
A while ago the inbound mail into bugzilla from replies to this group 
broke.  I
 figured out why, but the fix wasn't pleasant -- the perl code wasn't 
 compatible
 with a perl upgrade (5.8 -> 5.10).  The migration I did tonight ought to 
 make it
 possible for me to put that mechanism back together.. however I figured 
 I'd take
 a poll.

 Who found it useful and/or desirable?

 It's been disabled long enough that I figured I should see if it's worth
 re-instating.

 Thanks,
 Brad

I didn't know there was ever such a feature :)

Personally, I'm fairly accustomed to adding replies on the actual web-page 
interface. 

Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> writes:

Brad Roberts wrote:
 Who found it useful and/or desirable?

I think it's useful and desirable, as otherwise there'll be two separate 
threads about each bug.