digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 9628] New: Lambda in foreach loop Vs. lambda in static foreach loop
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (53/53) Mar 01 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (34/34) Mar 02 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) May 13 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Jun 08 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Jun 08 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Jun 08 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628 Summary: Lambda in foreach loop Vs. lambda in static foreach loop Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs eml.cc This program shows two similar versions of the same loop: import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.typetuple, std.range; void main() { auto items = [[10, 20], [30]]; foreach (_; 0 .. 2) { foreach (sub; items) { iota(sub.length) .map!((i){ writeln(sub); return 0; }) .array(); } } writeln(); foreach (_; TypeTuple!(0, 1)) { foreach (sub; items) { iota(sub.length) .map!((i){ writeln(sub); return 0; }) .array(); } } } Its output (dmd 2.063alpha): [10, 20] [10, 20] [30] [10, 20] [10, 20] [30] [10, 20] [10, 20] [30] [30] [30] [30] Probably the two loops should give the same output. (Also, this program can't be compiled with -inline). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 01 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628 Maxim Fomin <maxim maxim-fomin.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maxim maxim-fomin.ru --- Rewritten version (this can be complied with -inline): import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.typetuple, std.range; auto items = [[10, 20], [30]]; void bar() { foreach (int dx; 0 .. 2) { foreach (sub; items) { iota(sub.length) .map!((size_t i){ writeln(dx,"--", sub,"--", items); return 0; }) .array(); }} } void foo() { foreach (int dx; TypeTuple!(0, 1)) { foreach (sub; items) { iota(sub.length) .map!((size_t i){ writeln(dx,"--", sub,"--", items); return 0; }) .array(); }} } void main() { bar(), writeln(), foo(); } dx in second loop is always zero -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 02 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2029 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 13 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628 Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/0ba974c94e61af361aa77756bfdcf4a9353b546f fix Issue 9628 - Lambda in foreach loop Vs. lambda in static foreach loop https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/a8f842e12154eee7d79c1943f6e3806116cf0525 Issue 9628 - Lambda in foreach loop Vs. lambda in static foreach loop -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 08 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628 bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 08 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9628 The loop can't be compiled with -inline, but the main problem seems fixed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 08 2013