digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 9616] New: SortedRange should support all range kinds
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (20/20) Feb 28 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9616
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (19/19) Feb 28 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9616
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9616 Summary: SortedRange should support all range kinds Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: andrei erdani.com PST --- There's no inherent reason for which SortedRange shouldn't support all kinds of ranges. There are e.g. files that are known to be sorted, and there are algorithms on sorted ranges that don't need random access, such as merge, diff etc. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 28 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9616 bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bearophile_hugs eml.cc Severity|normal |enhancement I have converted this to an enhancement request, if that's OK. Is this ER vaguely related to this question I have asked? http://forum.dlang.org/thread/zmiqbifxevljazceowif forum.dlang.org If SortedRange supports Input Ranges too, then group(SortedRange) is able to be a SortedRange. But unfortunately if you apply an array on that lazy SortedRange, you get an array and you lose the SortedRange quality. In my code I'd like to perform a binary search on the result of a "sort.group.array". Currently I have to use "sort.group.array.assumeSorted". -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 28 2013