digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 956] New: Testing Class Object for null reference causes Access Violation Error
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (30/30) Feb 13 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=956
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Feb 13 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=956
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Feb 13 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=956
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=956 Summary: Testing Class Object for null reference causes Access Violation Error Product: D Version: 1.005 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: hennrich.bloebaum gmx.de class MyClass { } void main() { MyClass[] myArray = null; MyClass myObject = null; if(!myArray) { // Ok } if(myArray == null) { // Works on dynamic arrays } if(!myObject) { // Ok } if(myObject == null) { // Error: Access Violation } } --
Feb 13 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=956 ------- Comment #1 from ddparnell bigpond.com 2007-02-13 08:20 ------- Not a bug. The form "object == null" gets transformed as object.opEquals(null), and so if the object is actually null already, the invocation of it's opEquals member fails. The documented method of testing for null objects is if (object is null) ... --
Feb 13 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=956 torhu yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --
Feb 13 2007