digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 9273] New: DMD Segfaulting with templated ctors
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (29/29) Jan 05 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (37/37) Jan 05 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (31/33) Jan 08 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Jan 08 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (15/15) Jan 08 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Jan 08 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Jan 09 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Jan 09 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273 Summary: DMD Segfaulting with templated ctors Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: admin dav1d.de class NBTFile : TAG_Compound { } template _Base_TAG(int id_, DType_) { this(T)() { } } class TAG { } class TAG_Compound { mixin _Base_TAG!(10, TAG); } This segfaults dmd, it's a dustmite reduction the whole code compiled under 2.060 so I guess it's a regression. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 05 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273 To make it even better: Compiles: --------------------------------------- class NBTFile : TAG_Compound { this()() {} } template _Base_TAG(int id_, DType_) { this(T)() { } } struct TAG {} class TAG_Compound { mixin _Base_TAG!(10, TAG); } --------------------------------------- Fails: --------------------------------------- class NBTFile : TAG_Compound { this()() {} } template _Base_TAG(int id_, DType_) { this(T)() { } } struct TAG {} class TAG_Compound { mixin _Base_TAG!(10, TAG); } void main() { NBTFile s = new NBTFile(); } --------------------------------------- -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 05 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice A simplified test case: --- template CtorMixin() { this(T)() {} } class B { mixin CtorMixin!(); } class C : B { this()() {} } void main() { auto c = new C(); } ---This segfaults dmd, it's a dustmite reduction the whole code compiled under 2.060 so I guess it's a regression.I think it is an accepts-invalid code in 2.060 and earlier. In class NBTFile, implicitly generated default constructor will try to call super class default constructor. But, in its super class TAG_Compound, template constructor - which mixed in by _Base_TAG - requires explicit template parameter to call. Therefore, the generating an implicit constructor in NBTFile and whole compilation should fail. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 08 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273 *** Issue 8768 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 08 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273 Most simple test case from bug 8768. --- class A { this(T)() {} } class B : A { this() {} } ---- B.this() cannot call A.this(T)() implicitly. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 08 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1451 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 08 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273 Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/1c8305dbf70dafb1528b73c317108fb2901eb604 fix Issue 9284 - DMD segfaults with templated ctors in constructor delegation https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/a899e6147517f78f6d23064ca764533b789b8579 Issue 9273 & 9284 - DMD segfaults with templated ctors -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 09 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9273 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 09 2013