www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 9098] New: Error with ddoc: octal digit expected

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9098

           Summary: Error with ddoc: octal digit expected
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: andrej.mitrovich gmail.com



13:24:25 PST ---
Seems to be introduced in 2.060:

D:\dmd-git\dmd2\src\d-programming-language.org>make -f win32.mak function.html
dmd -o- -c -D macros.ddoc windows.ddoc doc.ddoc function.dd

(1): Error: Octal digit expected
(10): Error: Octal digit expected
(12): Error: Octal digit expected

The html file is properly generated (diff shows they match in 2.059 and 2.060).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 29 2012
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9098


Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |pull
         AssignedTo|nobody puremagic.com        |andrej.mitrovich gmail.com



09:19:43 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/203

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 02 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9098


Alex Rønne Petersen <alex lycus.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |alex lycus.org
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 02 2012
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9098


yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yebblies gmail.com



Why on earth aren't the errors gagged while processing code samples?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 12 2013
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9098




07:58:02 PST ---

 Why on earth aren't the errors gagged while processing code samples?
Because it allows us to catch bugs like these before the user has to face disappointment when he finds out the code doesn't compile. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 13 2013
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9098






 Why on earth aren't the errors gagged while processing code samples?
Because it allows us to catch bugs like these before the user has to face disappointment when he finds out the code doesn't compile.
But it only catches lexical errors... -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 14 2013