digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 8411] New: core.time: No easy way to check if Duration is empty
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (22/22) Jul 22 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8411
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/16) Jan 24 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8411
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Jan 24 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8411
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8411 Summary: core.time: No easy way to check if Duration is empty Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: druntime AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: thecybershadow gmail.com 06:46:38 PDT --- The simplest way to check for an empty Duration seems to be: if (!duration.total!"hnsecs"()) { ... } I suggest either implementing an isEmpty property (given that there already is an isNegative property), or implement opCast!bool so that the following will work: if (!duration) { ... } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 22 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8411 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisProg gmx.com PST --- We now have Duration.zero, so if(duration != Duration.zero) will work as will if(duration != Duration.init) But there's no such thing as an "empty" duration. All durations have a value, and they aren't ranges or containers. It makes as much sense to have an isEmpty property on a Duration as it does to have it on an int. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 24 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8411 09:13:59 EET --- An interval has a .empty property, though. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 24 2013