digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 723] New: bad mixin of class definitions at function level: func.c:535: virtual void FuncDeclaration::semantic3(Scope*): Assertion `0' failed
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (36/36) Dec 23 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=723
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Sep 18 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=723
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Nov 03 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=723
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=723
Summary: bad mixin of class definitions at function level:
func.c:535: virtual void
FuncDeclaration::semantic3(Scope*): Assertion `0' failed
Product: D
Version: 0.177
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: thomas-dloop kuehne.cn
(Origially reported by bobef <bobef lessequal.com> on 2006-03-02
as news:du4ong$1b0n$2 digitaldaemon.com)
test cases:
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/t/this_10_D.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/t/this_10_E.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/t/this_10_F.d
--
Dec 23 2006
d-bugmail puremagic.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=723
smjg iname.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |smjg iname.com
BugsThisDependsOn| |717
Clearly this is related to issue 717, if not a dupe. But my comment there on
the legality of such code applies equally here.
--
Sep 18 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=723
bugzilla digitalmars.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Fixed dmd 1.023 and 2.007
--
Nov 03 2007