digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 6707] New: Error message for mismatch of const/non-const property functions needs to improve
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (33/33) Sep 21 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (18/18) Oct 04 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Oct 08 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Oct 08 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Oct 19 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (34/34) Oct 21 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/13) Oct 21 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/14) Oct 21 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Dec 10 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Dec 27 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Jan 07 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Summary: Error message for mismatch of const/non-const property functions needs to improve Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: andrej.mitrovich gmail.com 08:44:17 PDT --- struct Foo { int payload; property void value(int x) { payload = x;} property int value() { return payload; } const bool opEquals(ref const(Foo) other) { return this.value == other.value; } } void main() { } This errors with: Error: function test.Foo.value (int x) is not callable using argument types () The solution is to add a const property function like this one: property const(int) value() const { return payload; } But this can't be easily figured out from that error message. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 21 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 12:56:30 PDT --- Better test case: struct Foo { property bool value() { return true; } void test() const { auto x = value; // not callable using argument types () auto y = value(); // not callable using argument types () const } } void main() { } It seems 'this' for property func isn't printed out properly unless it's called as a function, I'll see if this is fixable. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 04 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/d123b58057a8116d3549418551ed7ea03f9c46cd Fixes Issue 6707 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b022c3c66616600cdf349d53d32983774b72fdbd Fix Issue 6707 - Print better error message on const property mismatch -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 08 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |braddr puremagic.com Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 08 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bearophile_hugs eml.cc 20:57:42 PDT --- *** Issue 8549 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 19 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | Severity|normal |enhancement I reopen this as enhancement request because I think the error message is not good enough still. See Issue 8549 for more info. This program: struct Foo { int[] opSlice() { return [0]; } } struct Bar { Foo spam; const(Foo) bar() const { return spam; } } void main() { Bar().bar()[]; } Currently gives: test.d(11): Error: function test.Foo.opSlice () is not callable using argument types () const In Issue 8549 Andrej Mitrovic suggests an error message similar to: Error: function test.Foo.opSlice () is not callable using const(this) But I think a better error message, more newbie-friendly, tells the programmer how to fix the problem, (not complete error message): test.d(11): Error: function test.Foo.opSlice() needs to be const to [...] -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 21 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 14:15:14 PDT ---But I think a better error message, more newbie-friendly, tells the programmer how to fix the problem, (not complete error message): test.d(11): Error: function test.Foo.opSlice() needs to be const to [...]If it's in a 3rd party library then the user has no other choice but to use a const object. I don't think we should start recommending to rewrite code like that, especially to newbies. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 21 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707If it's in a 3rd party library then the user has no other choice but to use a const object. I don't think we should start recommending to rewrite code like that, especially to newbies.I understand. Time ago I have seen this error message and it took me some some to understand what's the problem. So I've asked for a simpler to understand error message. If you think my suggestion is not good, then do something different :-) Maybe we should ask to more people in the D newsgroup. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 21 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla kyllingen.net 08:57:39 PST --- *** Issue 9132 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 10 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE 17:43:17 PST --- The pull for Issue 1730 will likely resolve your issue of the unreadable error message. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 1730 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 27 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmitry.olsh gmail.com *** Issue 8552 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 07 2013