digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 6616] New: foreach argument type inference
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (39/39) Sep 07 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (14/14) Sep 07 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Sep 07 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/10) Sep 07 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616 Summary: foreach argument type inference Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2011-09-07 00:57:03 PDT --- In this program the Foo struct is large, so I use ref to avoid its copies. I also use const because I want to make sure (and document) the two loops will not change the matrix contents: struct Foo { int[1000] a; } void bar(ref Foo x) {} void main() { auto m = new Foo[][](3, 3); foreach (const(Foo[]) row; m) foreach (ref const(Foo) x; row) bar(x); } But I'd like type inference there, and be able to write something like: struct Foo { int[1000] a; } void bar(ref Foo x) {} void main() { auto m = new Foo[][](3, 3); foreach (const row; m) foreach (ref const x; row) bar(x); } With DMD 2.055beta3 this gives: test.d(5): no identifier for declarator const(row) test.d(6): no identifier for declarator const(x) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 07 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616 yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |yebblies gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> 2011-09-07 18:14:50 EST --- You're kidding me right? This is the THIRD time you've reported this exact bug. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4090 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 07 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_hugs eml.cc 2011-09-07 02:07:39 PDT --- I am sorry. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 07 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616 --- Comment #3 from yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> 2011-09-07 19:15:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #2)I am sorry.Just don't forget to do a quick search first next time! I know you have over 200 enhancement requests open, but it might be worth going through and checking they all still make sense. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 07 2011