digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 6489] New: Should be able to copy double[] to float[]
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (24/24) Aug 13 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Aug 13 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/10) Aug 13 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (14/14) Aug 15 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Aug 27 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Aug 27 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
Summary: Should be able to copy double[] to float[]
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
ReportedBy: dsimcha yahoo.com
void main() {
float[] f;
double[] d;
f[] = d[];
}
test9.d(4): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (d[]) of type double[]
to const(float[])
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 13 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bearophile_hugs eml.cc
Why? And only double->float? int->long too?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 13 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489Why? And only double->float? int->long too?Of course int -> long should work, too. Same with anything where implicit conversions are allowed. It's just that double -> float is the first case I stumbled upon. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 13 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com
Platform|Other |All
OS/Version|Windows |All
Severity|normal |enhancement
11:50:21 PDT ---
What is the compelling rationale for this? Is there a use case that shows it?
(Also marked as an enhancement request, as it is not a bug.)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 15 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489 The compelling rationale is consistency. I can assign the elements of a float[] to a double[] one-by-one, so why not with array-wise operations? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 27 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489
Please show one or more use case.
Do you want it to be like a reinterpret cast? Currently this works:
void main() {
ushort[4] a = [1, 2, 3, 4];
uint[2] b = cast(uint[2])a;
assert(b == [131073, 262147]);
}
Mixing reinterpret cast with conversion casts is a bad design.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 27 2011









d-bugmail puremagic.com 