www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 6266] New: Mac OSX linker fails to recognize private method of interface

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6266

           Summary: Mac OSX linker fails to recognize private method of
                    interface
           Product: D
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: x86_64
        OS/Version: Mac OS X
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: blazej.podsiadlo gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from Blazej Podsiadlo <blazej.podsiadlo gmail.com> 2011-07-07
13:20:14 PDT ---
Hi,
Linker fails to process following code when interface methods are private:
The same code with protected/public methods works fine...
-----------------------------
import std.stdio;

interface Foo {
  private void foo();

    public final void doFooFoo() {
        foo();
        foo();
    };

};

class MyFoo : Foo {
  override private void foo() {
        writeln("foo()");
    }
};

void main(string[] args) {
    MyFoo mf = new MyFoo;
    mf.doFooFoo();
    writeln("Done.");
}
---------------------------
Undefined symbols for architecture i386:
  "_D4stat3Foo3fooMFZv", referenced from:
      _D4stat3Foo8doFooFooMFZv in stat.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture i386
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--- errorlevel 1

Best Regards,
Blazej

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 07 2011
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6266



--- Comment #1 from Blazej Podsiadlo <blazej.podsiadlo gmail.com> 2011-07-07
13:21:50 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1005)
The object file compiled by dmd -c

orginal name was stat.o

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 07 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6266


yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yebblies gmail.com


--- Comment #2 from yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> 2011-07-08 16:08:56 EST ---
private methods are implicitly final.  It is correct that it fails to link, but
it should be an error as MyFoo.foo does not override any function.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 07 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6266


yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


--- Comment #3 from yebblies <yebblies gmail.com> 2011-07-08 17:00:15 EST ---
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3581 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 08 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6266


Blazej Podsiadlo <blazej.podsiadlo gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


--- Comment #4 from Blazej Podsiadlo <blazej.podsiadlo gmail.com> 2011-07-10
11:49:48 PDT ---
Hi,
I'm not sure if all private methods should be implicitly final.
I've been trying to implement NVI (Non-Virtual Interface) Idiom found in
Alexandrescu's book (p213).
Could you please make sure about that?
Thank you,
Blazej

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 10 2011
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6266


kennytm gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


--- Comment #5 from kennytm gmail.com 2011-07-10 11:54:22 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)

 Hi,
 I'm not sure if all private methods should be implicitly final.
 I've been trying to implement NVI (Non-Virtual Interface) Idiom found in
 Alexandrescu's book (p213).
 Could you please make sure about that?
 Thank you,
 Blazej


Please put the comment to bug 4542.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3581 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 10 2011