www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 6146] New: A way to mark a static construct as having no dependencies

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6146

           Summary: A way to mark a static construct as having no
                    dependencies
           Product: D
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: jmdavisProg gmx.com


--- Comment #0 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> 2011-06-11 00:19:12
PDT ---
It would really help in dealing with circular dependencies between modules if
it were possible to mark a static constructor as not having any dependencies.
It's often the case, and it's a royal pain to get rid of a circular dependency
once the compiler (or is it druntime?) decides that you have one. If you have a
true circular dependency, then you need to redesign things, but if you don't,
then the current status of things is _very_ annoying.

It seems to me that it could be as simple as adding a new attribute (e.g.
 nodeps) which only applied to static constructors and then that static
constructor is then ignored in the tests for circular dependencies. I don't
know how much work it would be to effect such a change, but it at least seems
like it would be a fairly small change, and it would have major benefits. It's
incredibly easy to get a circular dependency once you start using many static
constructors, and the vast majority of the time there isn't really a
dependency. So, having a means to indicate that a static constructor has no
external dependencies would help a lot.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 11 2011
parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6146


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> 2012-01-20 23:17:21
PST ---
I'd love to have something like this, but Walter is completely against it, so
it's never going to happen.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 20 2012