www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 5936] New: DMD Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter.

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936

           Summary: DMD Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return
                    member function with parameter.
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Mac OS X
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, rejects-valid
          Severity: regression
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: kennytm gmail.com
            Blocks: 340


--- Comment #0 from kennytm gmail.com 2011-05-06 08:44:05 PDT ---
Test case:

---------------------------
import std.c.stdio;
int a() {
    return V.s(0);
}
struct V {
    static pure auto s(int x) {
        return 55;
    }
}
void main() {
    printf("%d\n", a());
}
---------------------------
Bus error
---------------------------

The bug appears only if all of the following conditions are met:
 1. The function 's' must be 'pure'. 
 2. The function 's' must have auto-return.
 3. The function 's' must have at least one named parameter. For example, if
    the parameter is changed to 'pure auto s(...)' the bug disappears.
 4. The function 's' must be placed after its first use. For example, moving
    'struct V' above 'int a()' the bug disappears.

The program works correctly in 2.048. Therefore I have marked this as a
regression.

============================

If instead of calling the function, we just compute the pointer of 's', we'll
get a forward reference error instead:

---------------------------
void a() {
    cast(void)(&V.s);
}
struct V {
    static pure auto s(int x) {
        return 0;
    }
}
---------------------------
x.d(2): Error: forward reference to s
---------------------------

But this error also happens on 2.048.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 06 2011
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch
                 CC|                            |clugdbug yahoo.com.au
            Summary|DMD Segfault when           |Regression(2.050): Segfault
                   |forward-referencing pure    |when forward-referencing
                   |auto-return member function |pure auto-return member
                   |with parameter.             |function with parameter.


--- Comment #1 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> 2011-06-06 06:18:17 PDT ---
The segfault is a simple null pointer dereference which can easily be patched.

mtype.c, TypeFunction::parameterEscapes, line 5369

    if (purity)
    {   /* With pure functions, we need only be concerned if p escapes
         * via any return statement.
         */
-        Type* tret = nextOf()->toBasetype();
-        if (!isref && !tret->hasPointers())
+        Type* tret = nextOf() ? nextOf()->toBasetype() : NULL;
+        if (!isref && tret && !tret->hasPointers())
        {   /* The result has no references, so p could not be escaping
             * that way.
             */
            return FALSE;
        }

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 06 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936



--- Comment #2 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> 2011-06-06 06:21:15 PDT ---
*** Issue 5844 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 06 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936



--- Comment #3 from kennytm gmail.com 2011-06-30 11:27:04 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 The segfault is a simple null pointer dereference which can easily be patched.
 
 mtype.c, TypeFunction::parameterEscapes, line 5369
 
     if (purity)
     {   /* With pure functions, we need only be concerned if p escapes
          * via any return statement.
          */
 -        Type* tret = nextOf()->toBasetype();
 -        if (!isref && !tret->hasPointers())
 +        Type* tret = nextOf() ? nextOf()->toBasetype() : NULL;
 +        if (!isref && tret && !tret->hasPointers())
         {   /* The result has no references, so p could not be escaping
              * that way.
              */
             return FALSE;
         }
This patch only fixes 5844. In git master this becomes Internal error: toir.c 190 with or without your patch. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 30 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936



--- Comment #4 from kennytm gmail.com 2011-07-27 11:48:10 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 (In reply to comment #1)
 This patch only fixes 5844. In git master this becomes
 
    Internal error: toir.c 190
 
 with or without your patch.
As of the latest git master the ICE no longer happens and the test cases now behaves normally. Also, one more test case which involves CTFE, based on std.complex.complex: --------------------------- auto bug5936c(R)(R i) safe pure nothrow { return true; } static assert( bug5936c(0) ); --------------------------- -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 27 2011
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936



--- Comment #5 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> 2011-08-24 11:39:00 PDT ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/330

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 24 2011
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936


Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |bugzilla digitalmars.com
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


--- Comment #6 from Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> 2011-08-24
13:40:31 PDT ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b9ee455e4e8c129b429d8e22fd4f6d15885274fb

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 24 2011