digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 5872] New: core.demangle, core.sys.*, core.stdc.* not documented
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (20/20) Apr 23 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (15/15) May 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/13) May 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) May 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) May 09 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/15) May 10 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 Summary: core.demangle, core.sys.*, core.stdc.* not documented Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All URL: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/phobos.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: websites AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: kennytm gmail.com --- Comment #0 from kennytm gmail.com 2011-04-23 05:30:56 PDT --- As titled, the module core.demangle and the subpackages core.sys.* and core.stdc.* are not found in the link in http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/phobos.html. They should be documented. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 23 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sean invisibleduck.org --- Comment #1 from Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> 2011-05-06 10:56:50 PDT --- I'll take care of core.demangle. core.sys.* and core.stdc.* are interfaces for C libraries and I'd expect the user to refer to the documentation for those libraries directly. Documenting that stuff would be a tremendous amount of work and risks copyright violation if I simply paste it in from the reference docs. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 --- Comment #2 from kennytm gmail.com 2011-05-06 11:21:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1)I'll take care of core.demangle. core.sys.* and core.stdc.* are interfaces for C libraries and I'd expect the user to refer to the documentation for those libraries directly. Documenting that stuff would be a tremendous amount of work and risks copyright violation if I simply paste it in from the reference docs.Well, at least mention what modules are inside these subpackages (e.g. it is core.sys.posix.setjmp, not core.stdc.setjmp). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |doob me.com --- Comment #3 from Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> 2011-05-06 11:47:13 PDT --- How about add an empty doc comment at every declaration making the declarations visible in the documentation. And also add a note that the user should look up the original documentation, perhaps even with a link. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 06 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 --- Comment #4 from Sean Kelly <sean invisibleduck.org> 2011-05-09 15:25:28 PDT --- The module headers already say which spec they follow. What if I added a hyperlink to the official docs (when available) as well? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 09 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 --- Comment #5 from Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> 2011-05-10 00:21:46 PDT --- I think (In reply to comment #4)The module headers already say which spec they follow. What if I added a hyperlink to the official docs (when available) as well?To me, ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E), for example, doesn't say much, so yes, a link would be better. But I think the most important thing is that the modules show up in the documentation here: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/phobos.html so one know that they exist at all. It would also help if every declaration also show up in the documentation, even though it's only the declaration and no actual documentation. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 10 2011