digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 566] New: Adding non-static members and functions to classes doesn't error
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (35/35) Nov 18 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/8) Jan 29 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (27/27) Jan 29 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/8) Apr 19 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (4/4) Apr 19 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/16) Apr 19 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (5/5) Jun 28 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Jul 09 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
Summary: Adding non-static members and functions to classes
doesn't error
Product: D
Version: 0.174
Platform: PC
URL: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/template.html
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: spec
Severity: normal
Priority: P4
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: deewiant gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO 511
nThis:
Under the "Limitations" section, the spec states "[t]emplates cannot be used to
add non-static members or functions to classes" and showcases the following
code:
class Foo
{
template TBar(T)
{
T xx; // Error
int func(T) { ... } // Error
static T yy; // Ok
static int func(T t, int y) { ... } // Ok
}
}
The lines marked with "// Error" don't fail to compile, they simply behave as
though they were declared static. The static attribute on yy and the second
func() is thus redundant.
Either the spec or DMD is wrong here.
--
Nov 18 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
kamm incasoftware.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kamm incasoftware.de
*** Bug 878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Jan 29 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
Things seem to have changed a bit: now only the member variable is silently
made static while the member function works as a real non-static member
template.
class Foo
{
template TBar(T)
{
T x; // Compiles, but is implicitly static
void func(T t) // Ok, non-static member template function
{ writefln(t); writefln(this.bar); }
}
int bar = 42;
}
void main()
{
Foo.TBar!(int).x = 2;
Foo.TBar!(int).func(2); // error, since funcx is not static
Foo f = new Foo;
Foo g = new Foo;
f.TBar!(int).func(2); // works
f.TBar!(int).x = 10;
g.TBar!(int).x = 20;
writefln(f.TBar!(int).x); // prints 20
}
--
Jan 29 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
kamm-removethis incasoftware.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dvdfrdmn users.sf.net
-------
*** Bug 2015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Apr 19 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566 *** Bug 2015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --
Apr 19 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
A slightly different test case. The following compiles, but fails to link.
----
interface TestInterface
{ void tpl(T)(); }
class TestImplementation : TestInterface
{ void tpl(T)() { } }
void main()
{
/* TestImplementation t = new TestImplementation(); // works */
TestInterface t = new TestImplementation(); // fails
t.tpl!(int)();
}
---
--
Apr 19 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566 I think the current behavior is useful, but it needs to be documented. The second issue is an error that should be detected by the compiler. --
Jun 28 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=566
bugzilla digitalmars.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Fixed dmd 1.032 and 2.016
--
Jul 09 2008









d-bugmail puremagic.com 