digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 5585] New: bad debug line number info for return statements with enumerator expressions
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (51/51) Feb 15 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Jul 17 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Jul 17 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5585
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5585 Summary: bad debug line number info for return statements with enumerator expressions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: r.sagitario gmx.de --- Comment #0 from Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> 2011-02-15 00:19:07 PST --- When compiled by dmd with debug information, stepping through the following code in a debugger enum { Success, Failure } int main() { return Success; } makes the debugger jump to the enumerator declaration when the instruction pointer is in fact at the return statement. This can be very annoying because there is no information of the actual line of execution, you have to guess from the disassembly. This is happening because the line info is taken from the first expression of the return statement, which is the initializer expression of the enum identifier. I suggest forcing the line number to the statement instead. *** src\s2ir.c 2011-02-14 19:56:09.000000000 +-0100 --- src\s2ir.c 2011-02-07 01:49:13.000000000 +-0100 *************** *** 1287,1298 **** --- 1287,1299 ---- else { e = exp->toElem(irs); assert(e); } + elem_setLoc(e, loc); block_appendexp(blx->curblock, e); block_next(blx, BCretexp, NULL); } else block_next(blx, BCret, NULL); } This is under Windows, but I guess it also applies to other OS supported by dmd. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 15 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5585 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario gmx.de> 2011-07-17 01:47:36 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/258 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 17 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5585 Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> 2011-07-17 12:32:00 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/80456938e2302c36de54809af0f171d3becd8840 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/17daa94d2137a30cc8f81cc08b28d254c3555204 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 17 2011