• d-bugmail puremagic.com (19/19) Jan 27 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496
• d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/8) Jan 27 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496
• d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Jan 28 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496
• d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/8) Feb 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496
• d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Feb 06 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496

           Summary: 64bit: possible ABI issue in C runtime header.
           Product: D
           Version: D1 & D2
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: druntime
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: ibuclaw ubuntu.com


--- Comment #0 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> 2011-01-27 03:30:00 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=885)
patch mars.h for D2

Should be using ptrdiff_t rather than int struct Interface.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496



--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> 2011-01-27 03:33:51 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=886)
patch object.d and mars.h for D1

Backport patch for D1 too.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496



--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> 2011-01-28 04:54:50 PST ---
Edited summary for clarity sake.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496



--- Comment #3 from Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> 2011-02-06 16:27:40 PST
---
Do we really need to worry about supporting objects with vtables > 32bit?  I
don't think so.   Or is the d frontend already offset with a size_t offset and
this fixes the runtime to properly deal with this?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5496


Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |bugzilla digitalmars.com
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> 2011-02-06
18:04:26 PST ---
I agree with Brad. There's no way this will be larger than 32 bits.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------